Abstract
PurposeWe identify lessons from a project sponsored by a large charitable trust, which sought to build capability for end-of-life (EOL) care in Hong Kong through interdisciplinary and multi-agency collaboration.Design/methodology/approachAn in-depth case study drawing on 21 in-depth interviews with diverse stakeholders was conducted. Lyman et al.’s (2018) model of organisational learning (OL) in healthcare settings was applied to analyse the relative emphasis on particular contextual factors and mechanisms, and to identify outcomes perceived to have been achieved.FindingsInfrastructure such as materials for assessment and education received the most emphasis among the contextual factors and deliberate learning such as training sessions received the greatest attention among the mechanisms. While perceptions indicated that desired outcomes were being achieved in terms of social impact, there were relatively few mentions of “soft” factors such as enhanced motivation, leadership or OL skills among staff.Originality/valueThis study extends the literature on how to create valuable social impact through OL. While prior studies have examined social impact in terms of solutions for social and environmental problems, ours is one of the few that examines how improvements are made to organisations’ capability to deliver such impacts in the context of healthcare.
Reference41 articles.
1. The importance of soft skills development in a hard data world: learning from interviews with healthcare leaders;BMC Medical Education,2021
2. Seeking ‘conversations for accountability’: mediating the impact of non-governmental organization (NGO) upward accountability processes;Accountability, Auditing and Accountability Journal,2017
3. Organizational learning, learning organization, and learning orientation: an integrative review and framework;Human Resource Management Review,2021
4. Transformative service research, service design, and social entrepreneurship: an interdisciplinary framework advantage wellbeing and social impact;Journal of Service Management,2019
5. Closing the gap between scholarly knowledge and practice: guidelines for HRM action research;Human Resource Management Review,2021