Performance measurement in automated manufacturing

Author:

Mathur Alok,Dangayach G.S.,Mittal M.L.,Sharma Milind K.

Abstract

PurposeToday's customer‐focused paradigm of business environment puts tremendous pressures of quality, delivery, dependability, flexibility and cost on the manufacturing organisation. Automatic manufacturing systems offer several advantages and are increasingly being adopted as a strategy to improve the performance of manufacturing organisations. Automatic manufacturing systems are highly sophisticated and expensive, and it is therefore important to maximise their productivity. Yet, one can improve only what one can measure. Performance measurement is the key to improving performance, and is a prerequisite to diagnosing, trouble‐shooting and improving the production system. Accordingly, performance measurement has been attracting increasing attention over the last two decades, and several frameworks have emerged for the design, review, evaluation and improvement of performance measurement systems for businesses and manufacturing organizations. The performance measurement, monitoring and continuous productivity improvement of automatic manufacturing systems has assumed special significance on account of their high investments and operating costs.Design/methodology/approachA review of the current literature is undertaken to determine the current status and the status of performance measurement in automated production systems.FindingsOverall equipment effectiveness (OEE) has emerged as one important and universally accepted metric for measuring the overall performance of single automatic equipments. OEE has been further adapted and extended into several variations for use as a metric for automatic manufacturing systems consisting of several automatic machines.Originality/valueThis paper reviews the recent developments and the current status of performance measurement of automatic manufacturing systems.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference53 articles.

1. Andersson, T.D. (1996), “Traditional key ratio analysis versus data envelopment analysis: a comparison of various measurements of productivity and efficiency in restaurants”, in Jones, N. (Ed.), Productivity Management in Hospitality and Tourism, Cassell, London, pp. 209‐26.

2. Berkeley, J.B. Jr (1985), “The need for hierarchical standards for automated integrated manufacturing”, in Gardiner, L.B. (Ed.), Automated Manufacturing, ASTM STP 862, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 81‐93.

3. Bititci, U.S. (1994), “Measuring your way to profit”, Management Decision, Vol. 32 No. 6, pp. 16‐24.

4. Braglia, M., Frosolini, M. and Zammori, F. (2009), “Overall equipment effectiveness of a manufacturing line (OEEML)”, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 8‐29.

5. Brudan, A. (2010), “Rediscovering performance management: systems, learning and integration”, Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 109‐23.

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Estimates of Rayleigh distribution parameters in statistical methods of quality control;Journal of Physics: Conference Series;2023-09-01

2. Information systems quality in management accounting and management control effectiveness;Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change;2023-06-07

3. On the relationship between human factor and overall equipment effectiveness (OEE): An analysis through the adoption of analytic hierarchy process and ISO 22400;International Journal of Engineering Business Management;2023-01

4. Resource Overall Equipment Cost Loss indicator to assess equipment performance and product cost;International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management;2022-11-28

5. Analysis of potential factors affecting execution of overall equipment effectiveness in Indian sugar mills;Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering;2022-11-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3