Abstract
PurposeThis paper sets out to explore performance management as a discipline and propose an integrated performance management model.Design/methodology/approachThis conceptual paper aims to clarify what performance management is and how it emerged as a discipline by tracking its evolution at strategic, operational and individual levels. Structured as a review, it enables the rediscovery of performance management and the identification of several key dichotomies, brought together under an integrated performance management model.FindingsThree emerging approaches to performance management are presented as potential catalysts to accelerate the evolution of this discipline: systems thinking, learning and integration. An integrated performance management model is also proposed.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper draws on the consultancy and research experience of the author. The generated model is conceptual in essence and needs to be tested. Further research on the history of performance management as a discipline and the integration approach between organisational levels is needed.Practical implicationsThe paper makes suggestions for improving performance management governance – the introduction of the Performance Management Office. It also suggests a higher emphasis on learning and integration during the implementation and usage of performance management systems.Social implicationsBy outlining the importance of systems thinking in managing organisational performance, this paper highlights the need for encouraging its applicability and implementation through systemic thinking. A higher emphasis on including elements of systems thinking in educational curricula may be a possible step forward.Originality/valueThe paper is relevant to both practitioners and academics, as it clarifies the existing body of knowledge and provides a platform for future research
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference77 articles.
1. Ackoff, R. (1993), “From mechanistic to social systemic thinking”, opening address at the Systems Thinking in Action Conference, Boston, MA, 13‐15 November.
2. Ansoff, H.I. (1965), Corporate Strategy, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.
3. Astley, W.G. (1985), “Administrative science as socially constructed truth”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 497‐513.
4. Bandura, A. (1977), Social Learning Theory, General Learning Press, New York, NY.
5. Banner, D.K. and Cooke, R.A. (1984), “Ethical dilemmas in performance appraisal”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 3, pp. 327‐33.
Cited by
65 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献