Rediscovering performance management: systems, learning and integration

Author:

Brudan Aurel

Abstract

PurposeThis paper sets out to explore performance management as a discipline and propose an integrated performance management model.Design/methodology/approachThis conceptual paper aims to clarify what performance management is and how it emerged as a discipline by tracking its evolution at strategic, operational and individual levels. Structured as a review, it enables the rediscovery of performance management and the identification of several key dichotomies, brought together under an integrated performance management model.FindingsThree emerging approaches to performance management are presented as potential catalysts to accelerate the evolution of this discipline: systems thinking, learning and integration. An integrated performance management model is also proposed.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper draws on the consultancy and research experience of the author. The generated model is conceptual in essence and needs to be tested. Further research on the history of performance management as a discipline and the integration approach between organisational levels is needed.Practical implicationsThe paper makes suggestions for improving performance management governance – the introduction of the Performance Management Office. It also suggests a higher emphasis on learning and integration during the implementation and usage of performance management systems.Social implicationsBy outlining the importance of systems thinking in managing organisational performance, this paper highlights the need for encouraging its applicability and implementation through systemic thinking. A higher emphasis on including elements of systems thinking in educational curricula may be a possible step forward.Originality/valueThe paper is relevant to both practitioners and academics, as it clarifies the existing body of knowledge and provides a platform for future research

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference77 articles.

1. Ackoff, R. (1993), “From mechanistic to social systemic thinking”, opening address at the Systems Thinking in Action Conference, Boston, MA, 13‐15 November.

2. Ansoff, H.I. (1965), Corporate Strategy, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.

3. Astley, W.G. (1985), “Administrative science as socially constructed truth”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 497‐513.

4. Bandura, A. (1977), Social Learning Theory, General Learning Press, New York, NY.

5. Banner, D.K. and Cooke, R.A. (1984), “Ethical dilemmas in performance appraisal”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 3, pp. 327‐33.

Cited by 65 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3