Author:
Srivastava Ayushi,Pandey Agrata,Sharma Dheeraj,Ghosh Koustab
Abstract
Purpose
This paper integrates research on quiet quitting (a mindset where employees restrict their efforts to their job description) and organizational learning (OL) to illustrate how quiet quitting challenges the sub-processes of OL.
Design/methodology/approach
By integrating the existing literature on quiet quitting and OL, this paper identifies and maps the challenges of quiet quitting to the sub-processes of OL, namely, intuiting, interpreting, integrating, and institutionalizing within the 4I framework of Crossan et al. (1999).
Findings
This paper conceptually establishes that quiet quitting undermines employees’ cognitive efforts and weakens employees’ contribution to team discussions. Further, quiet quitting undermines suggestion sharing and creates a reluctance to share knowledge, undermining OL.
Practical implications
The paper provides actionable strategies for managers to tackle the challenges of quiet quitting on OL.
Originality/value
To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is amongst the first to illustrate the challenges of quiet quitting on OL.
Reference7 articles.
1. An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution;The Academy of Management Review,1999
2. Harter, B.J. (2023), “Is quiet quitting real?”, available at: www.gallup.com/workplace/398306/quiet-quitting-real.aspx (accessed 12 March 2024).
3. Quiet quitting: relationship with other concepts and implications for tourism and hospitality;International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,2023
4. Extending the 4I organizational learning model: information sources, foraging processes and tools;Administrative Sciences,2013
5. HRM and innovation: a multi-level organisational learning perspective;Human Resource Management Journal,2017