Abstract
Purpose
– Proposing a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) algorithm that is able to incorporate the heterogeneousness effect of DM group into the decision process, in order to determine the best remotely operated vehicle (ROV) design alternative to manufacture and developing a practical decision aid tool based on this algorithm. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
– An algorithm utilizes fuzzy AHP Buckley’s approach for modeling heterogeneousness of the DM group, fuzzy AHP Chang’s extent analysis to calculate the priority values of criteria and Chen’s fuzzy TOPSIS for ranking the alternatives and finally group working technique for initiation issues is developed. MATLAB is used to implement the algorithm and generate a decision aid tool. Real life application and sensitivity analysis is performed by the help of generated tool. Literature and background explanations are also provided.
Findings
– A MCDM algorithm that incorporates the heterogeneousness effect of the DM group into the decision process is introduced. Sensitivity analysis suggested the independence of the final result from DM group and criteria set. A practical decision aid tool is generated for ROV manufacturing companies.
Practical implications
– A computerized MCDM aid tool that incorporates heterogeneousness of the DM group into the decision process is generated. Tool let ROV manufacturing companies to evaluate ROV design alternatives with respect to qualitative and quantitative criteria and determine proper choice.
Originality/value
– Determination of the proper ROV design alternative to manufacture gap within the literature filled with an algorithm that provides more reliable results due to its incorporation the heterogeneousness of the DM group into the decision process characteristic. A practical decision aid tool is generated.
Subject
Computer Science (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Theoretical Computer Science,Control and Systems Engineering,Engineering (miscellaneous)
Reference44 articles.
1. Aktan, H.E.
and
Tosun, O.
(2013), “An integrated fuzzy AHP-fuzzy TOPSIS approach for AS/RS selection”,
International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management
, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 228-245.
2. Allmendinger, E.E.
(1990),
Submersible Vehicle Systems Design
, The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Jersey City, NJ.
3. Bagheri, A.
and
Moghaddam, J.J.
(2009), “Simulation and tracking control based on neural-network strategy and sliding-mode control for underwater remotely operated vehicle”,
Neurocomputing
, Vol. 72 No. 7, pp. 1934-1950.
4. Bellman, R.
and
Zadeh, L.A.
(1970), “Decision-making in a fuzzy environment”,
Management Science
, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 141-164.
5. Buckley, J.J.
(1985), “Fuzzy hierarchical analysis”,
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 233-247.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献