Trouble with tacit: developing a new perspective and approach

Author:

Crane Lesley,Bontis Nick

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this viewpoint paper is to question the widely adopted tacit-explicit distinction of knowledge, arguing that this is based on a misappraisal of the original source of the “tacit” phenomenon. Design/methodology/approach – It is argued that Michael Polanyi’s theory of personal knowledge and philosophical grounds have been misinterpreted. The tacit problem is approached from three different directions: knowledge management, cognitive psychology and discursive psychology. The first offers an imperative to regard the tacit as vital to organizational success and an underplayed “implicit” perspective on the tacit. The second offers empirical evidence for the formulation of the tacit as acquired automatically and unconsciously through implicit learning and as influencing action. The last offers a theory and methodology for studying what is argued as being the primary site of knowledge work – discourse. Findings – A novel aspect of the tacit – “tacit knowing” – is shown to be action-orientated and influential, and while it is a hidden aspect of a person’s knowledge, it can be revealed through the study and analysis of discourse. Originality/value – This is the first known paper in the extant literature to examine the tacit knowledge challenge from these combined directions. Implications for practice and study are discussed, and new directions for research proposed.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management

Reference63 articles.

1. Berry, D. and Broadbent, D. (1988), “Interactive tasks and the implicit-explicit distinction,” British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 79 No. 2, pp. 251-272.

2. Boisot, M. (2002), “The creation and sharing of knowledge,” in Choo, C. and Bontis, N. (Eds), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Management, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

3. Bontis, N. (1999), “Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: framing and advancing the state of the field,” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 18 Nos 5/6/7/8, pp. 433-462.

4. Bontis, N. (2001), “Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital,” International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 41-60.

5. Bouthillier, F. and Shearer, K. (2002), “Understanding knowledge management and information management: the need for an empirical perspective,” Information Research, Vol. 8 No. 1, paper No. 141, available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/8-1/paper141.html (accessed 23 May 2014).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3