Author:
López-Cabarcos M. Ángeles,Srinivasan Suresh,Vázquez-Rodríguez Paula
Abstract
PurposeBy fusing knowledge-based theory, organizational learning theory and dynamics capability theory, this study aims to explore, on the one hand, the linkage between exploration, sensing and tacit knowledge, and on the other hand, exploitation, seizing and explicit knowledge. Thereby, it argues that not only tacit knowledge but also explicit knowledge contributes to competitive advantage for firms. This study also investigates how knowledge transforms into profitability.Design/methodology/approachThe conceptual model is tested with a study sample of 153 industrial organizations using structural equation modelling.FindingsResults confirm the importance of both tacit and explicit knowledge for achieving sustainable competitive advantages. Furthermore, both tacit and explicit knowledge transform into profitability, both directly and through product innovation and customer centricity which play partial mediating roles.Practical implicationsExplicit knowledge strategies can be easier to manage, implement and institutionalize than tacit knowledge strategies, which require human component and intervention to succeed. Managers should hence first implement explicit knowledge strategies to gain expeditious results. Further, with the advent of digital technologies and algorithms that can extract deep customer insights and organizational experiences which are highly tacit in nature and codifying the same into explicit knowledge, the importance of explicit knowledge is further enlarged.Originality/valueBy fusing three adjacent theories to establish a robust model specification, this study is able to demonstrate the contribution of explicit knowledge in the firm’s competitive advantages.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management
Reference108 articles.
1. Accenture (2019), “Document-understanding-solutions”, available at: www.accenture.com/us-en/services/applied-intelligence/document-understanding-solutions (accessed 10 November 2019).
2. Odd couple: making sense of the curious concept of knowledge management;Journal of Management Studies,2001
3. Knowledge processes, knowledge‐intensity and innovation: a moderated mediation analysis;Journal of Knowledge Management,2011
4. Test of the resource-based view: do the empirics have any clothes?;Strategic Organization,2006
5. A framework to acquire explicit knowledge stored on different versions of software;Information and Software Technology,2016
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献