Learning to identify employees that are engaged, helpful and proactive
Author:
Lyons Paul,Bandura Randall Paul
Abstract
Purpose
– The purposes of this paper are to: help managers and other practitioners learn about voluntary, helpful employee behavior; provide examples of how such behavior is manifest in everyday work situations, and demonstrate how to assess the behavior for recruitment and selection. A brief study is presented that demonstrates how valid and reliable measures may be used to identify employee predisposition for voluntary, helpful behavior.
Design/methodology/approach
– Two substantive components of this work are: a detailed literature review that describes and demonstrates the elements of voluntary, helpful behavior (v-hob); and a report of a brief correlational study that demonstrates how two short surveys may help in predicting employee voluntary, helpful behavior.
Findings
– Literature review reveals that v-hob is related to many positive employee outcomes among which are better work performance, more positive relationships with co-workers and managers, and lower turnover, as contrasted with employees-in-general. The study undertaken reveals two measures: job dedication, and contextual performance are valuable in predicting employee v-hob.
Research limitations/implications
– In the survey portion of this paper the sample size is relatively small yet amenable for statistical analysis. Study participants are representative of a single academic discipline and are representative of the same university. The two survey tools used have repeatedly been shown to have validity and reliability.
Practical implications
– This paper offers a detailed view of employee helpful behavior and it helps managers develop ways to assess one
'
s proclivity for the behavior.
Originality/value
– This paper helps managers, HR specialists and others attain knowledge on the expression of employee v-hob. Two survey tools are provided to help identify employees who may be predisposed to offer this desirable behavior.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,General Business, Management and Accounting,Education
Reference26 articles.
1. Bandura, R.P.
and
Lyons, P.
(2012), “Helping managers stimulate employee voluntary helpful behavior”,
Industrial and Commercial Training
, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 94-102. 2. Bandura, R.P.
,
Johnson, R.
and
Lyons, P.
(2014), “Voluntary helpful organizational behavior: recognition of individual attributes”,
European Journal of Training and Development
, Vol. 38 No. 7, pp. 610-27. 3. Bergman, M.
,
Donovan, M.
,
Drasgow, F.
,
Overton, R.
and
Henning, J.
(2008), “Test of Motowidlo et al. (1997) theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance”,
Human Performance
, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 227-53. 4. Borman, W.C.
and
Motowidlo, S.
(1993), “Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance”, in
Schmitt, N.
and
Borman, W.C.
(Eds),
Personnel Selection
, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 71-98. 5. Borman, W.C.
and
Motowidlo, S.
(1997), “Task performance and contextual performance: the meaning for personnel research”,
Human Performance
, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 99-109.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|