Students reach beyond expectations with cafeteria style grading

Author:

Arendt Anne,Trego Angela,Allred Jonathan

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show that cafeteria style grading actually provides a course structure which encourages students to go beyond expectations. Design/methodology/approach – Three instructors offered a total of 13 sections of a general education science class called “Fundamentals of Technology” from January 2012 to December 2013 using a cafeteria-style grading method. This means students get to choose to do those assignments, quizzes or tests that appeal to their own learning interests or styles and do not need to complete all the assignments to get an A grade. Rather, they complete those assignments desired in order to earn the applicable points. This paper researches the combined results of over 400 students to assess the success of cafeteria style grading. Findings – These instructors found that half the students overall obtain an A grade and 9 percent of all students actually go above and beyond the requirements of an A grade by at least 5 percent. Actually, about 4 percent of students complete more than is required by an additional 10 percent or more. Originality/value – Cafeteria style grading is a little researched methodology for student assessment. The research shows that cafeteria style grading actually provides a course structure which encourages students to go beyond expectations.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference19 articles.

1. Barkley, E. (2010), Student Engagement Techniques , Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

2. Blankstein, A. , Cole, R. and Houston, P. (2007), Engaging Every Learner , Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.

3. Bowen, S. (2005), “Engaged learning: are we all on the same page?”, Peer Review , Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 4-7.

4. Dotger, S. and Causton-Theoharis, J. (2010), “Differentiation through choice: using a think-tac-toe for science content”, Science Scope , Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 18-23.

5. Goodwin, J.A. and Gilbert, B.D. (2001), “Cafeteria-style grading in general chemistry”, Journal of Chemical Education , Vol. 78 No. 4, pp. 490-493, available at: http://cpltl.iupui.edu/media/cfaac0df-062a-4322-81e1-f470cd828810/-1748818363/cPLTLContent/2013/PLTL%20Literature%20PDFs/Goodwin%20Gilbert_2001.pdf (accessed March 2, 2014).

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Choose your own adventure: understanding why students prefer certain types of assessment;Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice;2023-11-01

2. Effects of Using the Staged Self-Directed Learning Model at Distance English Learning;Participatory Educational Research;2023-01-30

3. Effect of Assignment Choice on Student Academic Performance in an Online Class;Behavior Analysis in Practice;2021-02-26

4. Choose your own assessment – assessment choice for students in online higher education;Teaching in Higher Education;2020-03-23

5. Evaluation of Multi-Peer and Self-Assessment in Higher Education;International Journal of Innovative Teaching and Learning in Higher Education;2020-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3