Google Scholar Author Citation Tracker: is it too little, too late?

Author:

Jacsó Péter

Abstract

PurposeSeven years after the release of Google Scholar in 2004, it was enhanced by a new module, the Google Scholar Author Citation Tracker (GSACT), currently a small subset of the complete Google Scholar (GS) database. The aim of this paper is to focus on this enhancement.Design/methodology/approachThe paper discusses the Google Scholar Author Citation Tracker, its features, potential benefits and problems.FindingsGSACT allows registered users to create and edit their scientific profiles and some bibliometric indicators, such as the h‐index, total citation counts, and the i10 index. These metrics are provided for the entire academic career of authors and for the most recent five‐year period. The new module also offers some long overdue essential options, such as sorting result lists of the documents by their publication year, title, and the citations receivedOriginality/valueThe paper shows that, at present, GSACT may be too little, too late. However, with an extension of the current clean‐up project it could possibly become a really scholarly resource in the long run.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems

Reference40 articles.

1. Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F., Herrera‐Viedma, E. and Herrera, F. (2009), “H‐Index: a review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields”, Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 273‐89.

2. Baneyx, A. (2008), “‘Publish or Perish’ as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities: international case studies in economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history”, Archivum Immunologiae Et Therapiae Experimentalis, Vol. 56 No. 6, pp. 363‐71.

3. Bar‐Ilan, J. (2008), “Which h‐index? – a comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar”, Scientometrics, Vol. 74 No. 2, pp. 257‐71, doi:10.1007/s11192‐008‐0216‐y.

4. Bornmann, L. (2011), “Do we need the e‐index in addition to the h‐index and its variants?”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 62 No. 7, pp. 1433‐4.

5. Bornmann, L. and Daniel, H.D. (2005), “Does the h‐index for ranking of scientists really work?”, Scientometrics, Vol. 65 No. 3, pp. 391‐2.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3