Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to report on an analysis of direct age discrimination cases by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the UK courts and employment tribunals over an 11-year period. The paper focusses upon age stereotyping towards older workers and analyses whether it is endorsed at the European level and/or national level.
Design/methodology/approach
This research has analysed a sample of 100 employment tribunal judgments concerning direct age discrimination together with 28 CJEU decisions on direct age discrimination.
Findings
This paper highlights that there are a number of cases in which age stereotyping has been endorsed at the CJEU level. By contrast, the UK courts and employment tribunals have adopted a more robust approach.
Research limitations/implications
The main limitation is that it only considers case law from the European Court and the influence on the UK case law, without analysing the eventual decisions of the other EU member states.
Originality/value
The paper contributes to the debate with regard to the approach of the CJEU and the UK courts and employment tribunals in tackling age stereotyping and is the first to examine the influence the CJEU decisions has had on the UK jurisprudence over the period studied.
Reference42 articles.
1. Old and unemployable? How age-based stereotypes affect willingness to hire job candidates;Journal of Social Issues,2016
2. Ending mandatory retirement: Reassessment;Windsor Review of Legal and Social Issues,2014
3. Benjamin, K. and Wilson, S. (2005), “Facts and misconceptions about age, health status and employability”, available at: www.hse.gov.uk/research/hsl_pdf/2005/hsl0520.pdf (accessed 14 October 2014).
4. Interrogating the ‘dignity’ argument for mandatory retirement: an undignified development?;Industrial Law Journal,2019
5. Marginalising the objective justification defence in retirement cases?;International Journal of Law and Management,2011
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献