Author:
Silvestro Rhian,Fitzgerald Lin,Johnston Robert,Voss Christopher
Abstract
Over the years manufacturing managers have been unified by their
acceptance of certain terminology to describe generic production
processes. This has facilitated the sharing of ideas and management
techniques and the development of our understanding of process choice
implications on manufacturing strategies. In the service literature, no
process model has been so powerful or pervasive as the manufacturing
model. Postulates that a service typology which transcends narrow
industry boundaries may lead to some cross‐fertilization of ideas and to
an understanding of the management methods and techniques appropriate to
each service type. Proposes a model analogous to the production process
model, which has achieved such universal recognition in the world of
manufacturing. Just as production volume is used in the latter model to
integrate a wide range of production process dimensions, so suggests
that the volume of customers processed per business unit per day
correlates with six classification dimensions developed from the service
operations literature. Proposes that the three types of service process,
professional service, service shop and mass service, give rise to
different management concerns, and that service strategy, control and
performance measurement will differ significantly between the three.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Cited by
293 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献