Author:
Yew Wong Kuan,Aspinwall Elaine
Abstract
PurposeTo investigate the critical success factors (CSFs) for adopting knowledge management (KM) in small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) – an area that has, to date, received very little attention in the literature.Design/methodology/approachA survey instrument comprising 11 factors and 66 elements was developed. Through a postal survey, data were sought from SMEs in the UK. A parallel one was also administered to a group of academics, consultants and practitioners in the KM field in order to provide a more holistic view of the CSFs.FindingsThe survey instrument was shown to be both reliable and valid. Pertinent statistical analyses were then performed. By integrating the results from both groups of respondents, a prioritised list of CSFs, in order of importance for implementing KM, was generated.Research limitations/implicationsThe number of responses received was rather small since KM is a new and emerging discipline, and not many SMEs have formally implemented it.Practical implicationsThe results of this study would help SMEs to better understand the KM discipline, to facilitate its adoption and to prioritise its practices. Academics can use the results to build models that would further expand the KM domain.Originality/valueThis study is probably the first to systematically determine the CSFs for KM implementation in the SME sector. It offers a beneficial source of information to SMEs, which are still lagging far behind when it comes to KM practices.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management
Reference58 articles.
1. Ahire, S.L., Golhar, D.Y. and Waller, M.A. (1996), “Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 23‐56.
2. Ahmed, P.K., Lim, K.K. and Zairi, M. (1999), “Measurement practice for knowledge management”, Journal of Workplace Learning: Employee Counselling Today, Vol. 11 No. 8, pp. 304‐11.
3. Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E. (2001), “Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 107‐36.
4. Albaum, G. (1997), “The Likert scale revisited: an alternative version”, Journal of the Market Research Society, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 331‐48.
5. American Productivity & Quality Center (1999), “Knowledge management: executive summary”, Consortium Benchmarking Study Best‐Practice Report, APQC, Houston, TX, available at: www.apqc.org.
Cited by
314 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献