Understanding marketing’s philosophy debates

Author:

Hunt Shelby

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this article is to chronicle the publication events in the 1980s and 1990s that framed the development of the series of controversies in marketing that are known as the “philosophy debates”. Design/methodology/approach – The article uses a participant’s retrospective approach. Findings – The article finds that seven publication events are key to understanding marketing’s philosophy debates. The seven are the publication of the “little green book” by Grid, Inc. in 1976; the philosophy of science panel discussion held at the Winter American Marketing Association Educators’ Conference in 1982; the special issue of the Journal of Marketing on marketing theory in 1983; three articles on the “critical relativist perspective” by the Journal of Consumer Research in 1986 and 1988; the “blue book” by South-Western in 1991; a trilogy of articles on truth, positivism and objectivity in the Journal of Marketing and the Journal of Consumer Research in 1990-1993; and an article on “rethinking marketing” in the European Journal of Marketing in 1994. Originality/value – Chronicling the key publication events enables readers to understand what the debates were about and provides readers a starting point for further investigating the issues in the debates.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Marketing

Reference56 articles.

1. Anderson, P.F. (1982), “Comments”, in Peter, and J.P. , “Current issues in the philosophy of science: implications for marketing theory – a panel discussion”, in Bush, R. and Hunt, S. (Eds), Marketing Theory: Philosophy of Science Perspectives , American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, pp. 11-21.

2. Anderson, P.F. (1983), “Marketing, scientific progress and scientific method”, Journal of Marketing , Vol. 47 No. 4, pp. 18-31.

3. Anderson, P.F. (1986), “On method in consumer research: a critical relativist perspective”, Journal of Consumer Research , Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 155-173.

4. Anderson, P.F. (1988), “Relative to what—that is the question: a reply to Siegel”, Journal of Consumer Research , Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 133-137.

5. Bagozzi, R.P. (1980), Causal Models in Marketing , John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Towards a Bhaskarian Metatheory for Marketing Systems;Journal of Macromarketing;2024-03-12

2. Die wissenschaftstheoretische Grundlage: Wissenschaftlicher Realismus;Grundlagen empirischer Forschung;2023

3. Hope for a stronger discipline of marketing;Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science;2021-01-28

4. The marketing discipline in trouble? Academic voices vying for supremacy;Management Decision;2019-10-15

5. Shelby D. Hunt: a retrospection on the importance, origins, and development of research programs;Journal of Historical Research in Marketing;2019-02-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3