Questioning: a path to student learning experience

Author:

Ozuem Wilson,Lancaster Geoff

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate connections between questioning, learning, achievement and conscious knowledge and beliefs held by tutors and how these are applied in a teaching/learning situation. Design/methodology/approach – The design of this study involved the authors listening to, but not participating in, classroom teaching sessions followed by individual in-depth discussions with tutors and students to ascertain how best to advance learning and achievement. Findings – Responses generated from questioning and dialogue helps tutors realign their teaching in response to the needs of learners including comprehending life issues and solving problems. Tutors should consider “think-pair share strategy” in their delivery. Research limitations/implications – Research was limited to one specific location, the sample was self-selected and limited to tutors who volunteered to take part in the investigation. A greater number of experimental locations with 100 per cent participation would have enhanced the validity of the findings. Practical implications – Learners need to be motivated to ask questions and be encouraged to become involved in discussions. Questioning and dialogue provide a framework for sharing educational objectives with students and charting their progress and this can lead to a better framework for delivery and understanding. Social implications – If tutors can better realign their teaching in response to the needs of learners including comprehending life issues and solving problems then this can lead to a more focused learning experience. Originality/value – The work was based on empirical investigations of tutors and learners in group and individual situations and the findings have been reported.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Education,Life-span and Life-course Studies

Reference53 articles.

1. Aqvist, L. (1979), “A conjectured axiomatization of two-dimensional Reichenbachian tense logic”, Journal of Philosophical Logic , Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 1-45.

2. Askew, S. and Lodge, C. (2000), “Gifts, ping-pong and loops – linking feedback and learning”, in Askew, S. (Ed.), Feedback for Learning , Routledge Falmer, London.

3. Barell, J. (2003), Developing More Curious Minds , Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA.

4. Beattie, M. (2004), Constructing Professional Knowledge in Teaching: A Narrative of Change and Development , Teachers College Press, New York, NY.

5. Beyer, B.K. (1997), Improving Student Thinking , Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3