Author:
Chen Zhen,Khumpaisal Sukulpat
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to introduce a novel decision‐making approach to risks assessment in commercial real estate development against social, economic, environmental, and technological (SEET) criteria. It therefore aims to describe a multiple criteria decision‐making model based on analytic network process (ANP) theory, and to use an experimental case study on an urban regeneration project in Liverpool to demonstrate the effectiveness of the ANP model.Design/methodology/approachThe paper commences with a description about risks related to commercial real estate development, and provides a list of risk assessment criteria based on literature review and experience in related areas. The ANP is then introduced as a powerful multicriteria decision‐making method. An experimental case study is finally conducted with scenarios and assumptions based on a real urban regeneration project in Liverpool.FindingsThe paper defines a group of risks assessment criteria against SEET requirements directly related to commercial real estate development. An ANP model is set up with 29 risks assessment criteria, and results from an experimental case study reveal that the ANP method is effective to support decision‐making based on risks assessment to select the most appropriate development plan; and therefore it is applicable in commercial area.Originality/valueThis paper defines SEET criteria for risks assessment in regard to SEET requirements to emphasise sustainable development; while the ANP is introduced to assess risks in commercial real estate development. The ANP model provides a platform for decision makers in commercial real estate development to evaluate different plans based on the degree of interactions among risk assessment criteria.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference35 articles.
1. Adair, A. and Hutchison, N. (2005), “The reporting of risk in real estate appraisal property risk scoring”, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 254‐68.
2. Bienert, S. and Brunauer, W. (2007), “The mortgage lending value: prospects for development within Europe”, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 542‐78.
3. Blundell, G.F., Fairchild, S. and Goodchild, R.N. (2005), “Managing portfolio risk in real estate”, Journal of Property Research, Vol. 22 Nos 2 and 3, pp. 119‐36.
4. Booth, P., Matysiak, G. and Ormerod, P. (2002), Risk Measurement and Management for Real Estate Portfolios, Investment Property Forum, London.
5. Case, K.E., Shiller, R.J. and Weiss, A.N. (1995), “Mortgage default risk and real estate prices: the use of index‐based futures and options in real estate”, Journal of Housing Research, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 243‐58.
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献