A systematic review of AACSB International accreditation quality and value research

Author:

MacKenzie Jr William I.,Scherer Robert F.,Wilkinson Timothy J.,Solomon Norman A.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to conduct a systematic review of the research on the quality and value of AACSB International accreditation. Design/methodology/approach Data were abstracted from published journal articles between 2003 and 2017 in which the words “AACSB” and “quality” or “value” (or both quality and value) were used in the title or the article text. Findings In total, 91 studies were identified that have been published on the value and/or quality of AACSB accreditation. These studies focused primarily on students and faculty and were conducted using survey research methods. Results indicate that accreditation does have some effects on stakeholder value and quality. Research limitations/implications While there is evidence to support the importance of accreditation to enhance the quality and value of business schools, additional research is needed to empirically support the quality and value propositions. Practical implications In order to effectively communicate to stakeholders how AACSB accreditation enhances the business school, the current study’s findings indicate that identification of indicators and factors that affect quality and value would be productive. Originality/value This study contributes insight on what is currently known about the quality and value of AACSB accreditation to both internal and external stakeholders from research conducted over an extended period of time.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Environmental Science

Reference40 articles.

1. AACSB International (2018a), “2013 eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation”, available at: www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/standards/business (accessed September 27, 2018).

2. AACSB International (2018b), “Accreditation organization website with information on accreditation standards, accredited business schools and relevant information”, available at: www.aacsb.edu/accreditation (accessed October 27, 2018).

3. Do business schools value the competencies that businesses value?;Journal of Education for Business,2009

4. Accreditation Council for Business Schools and Programs (2018), “Accreditation organization website”, available at: www.acbsp.org/ (accessed October 28, 2018).

5. The impact of regulation on management control: compliance as a strategic response to institutional logics of university accreditation;Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management,2015

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3