Impact of AACSB accreditation on education quality: perceptions of faculty in an accredited school in Japan

Author:

Ito HiroshiORCID,Takeuchi ShinichiORCID,Yokoyama Kenji,Makita Yukihiro,Ishii Masamichi

Abstract

PurposeThis study examines the impact of the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) accreditation on education quality. We discern the prospective influences of AACSB, focusing on shifts in teaching methods and content and assessment procedures.Design/methodology/approachUsing a case study approach, in-depth interviews are conducted with a Japanese-accredited business school’s faculty members to understand their perceptions of the school’s education-quality issues. The data were thematically analyzed.FindingsRespondents acknowledged that AACSB accreditation has positively influenced teaching, encouraging active learning and the case method. However, they also indicated that accreditation had a restrictive effect on assessment activities, pushing toward compliance rather than genuine learning evaluation. This dichotomy suggests a need for balancing standard adherence with the flexibility to maintain educational depth and assessment integrity.Research limitations/implicationsConvenience sampling may introduce self-selection bias. Furthermore, the qualitative case study approach does not allow for statistical generalization. However, when combined with existing literature, the findings can be analytically generalized and transferred to other contexts.Originality/valueWe provide insights regarding AACSB accreditation’s impact on business education, encompassing shifts in teaching methods and content and faculty perceptions of assessment. This study enhances the scholarly understanding of business school accreditation and offers guidance to accredited or accreditation-seeking academic institutions.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference42 articles.

1. AACSB (2020), “2020 Interpretive guidance”, available at: https://www.aacsb.edu/-/media/documents/accreditation/2020-interpretive-guidance-july-2021.pdf?rev=e9ca74d1736749f2a5ae3e5b0b7854bd

2. AACSB (2021), “The grade debate: absolute and relative grading measures”, available at: https://www.aacsb.edu/insights/articles/2021/10/grade-debate-absolute-and-relative-measures

3. AACSB (2023), “2020 Guiding principles and standards. AACSB International”, available at: https://www.aacsb.edu/-/media/documents/accreditation/2020-aacsb-business-accreditation-standards-june-2023.pdf

4. Shaking the status quo: business accreditation and positional competition;Academy of Management Learning and Education,2018

5. Assurance of learning: moving from a compliance to an improvement culture;American Journal of Business,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3