Facing failure

Author:

Beatson Nicola,Berg David,Smith Jeffrey K.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate failure in an introductory accounting course. Failure rates are often hard to explain and have a cost to both the individual and to the university. This paper offers insight into this complex matter. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses data gathered from a survey instrument on self-efficacy beliefs and personal written reflections from students who had previously failed the introductory accounting course to diagnose why students may have failed. Findings The key finding in this paper is that students are individuals and there can be multiple reasons for failure. Research limitations/implications One limitation in this paper is the sample size of six-student reflections. This in itself speaks to the difficultly in researching this area, as students are often not willing to face failure and discuss it. Practical implications The main contribution from this paper is an awareness for educators, as failure can occur for multiple reasons. This paper both adds to the literature on failure in accounting courses and helps inform educators of why their students may fail. Originality/value It is very challenging to research failure and therefore there is very little work on this area. At this time, the authors have no knowledge of any papers, which address the failure rates in introductory accounting courses from the individual perspective. Therefore, this paper has a unique contribution to the field of accounting education.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Finance,Accounting

Reference25 articles.

1. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales;Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents,2006

2. The impact of mastery feedback on undergraduate students’ self-efficacy beliefs;Studies in Educational Evaluation,2018

3. The influence of self‐efficacy beliefs and prior learning on performance;Accounting and Finance,2019

4. Failure rates in introductory programming;AcM SIGcSE Bulletin,2007

5. Time and learning;American Psychologist,1974

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3