Author:
Arturo Garza-Reyes Jose,Flint Ashley,Kumar Vikas,Antony Jiju,Soriano-Meier Horacio
Abstract
Purpose
– Problem solving and continuous process improvement are key elements to achieve business excellence. Many problem solving and process improvement methodologies have been proposed and adopted by organisations, with DMAIC being the most widely used. The purpose of this paper is to present an empirical application of a modified version of DMAIC which enabled a world-class organisation to achieve an optimum reduction in the lead time of its aerospace engine assembly process.
Design/methodology/approach
– The paper reviews the most commonly used problem solving and process improvement methodologies and specifically, DMAIC, its variations and limitations. Based on this, it presents define, measure, analyse, improve, review, control (DMAIRC). Finally, DMAIRC is empirically applied through a case study, in a world-class manufacturing organisation.
Findings
– The results obtained from the case study indicate that DMAIRC is an effective alternative to achieve the maximum improvement potential of a process. In particular, DMAIRC helped the organisation studied to achieve a 30 percent reduction in the lead time of its engine assembly process.
Originality/value
– The novel problem solving and process improvement methodology presented in this paper can be used by organisations to undertake a more effective improvement project by assuring that the maximum potential of their improvement initiatives and processes is achieved.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Computer Science Applications,Control and Systems Engineering,Software
Reference83 articles.
1. Anacleto, A.
,
von Wangenheim, C.G.
,
Salviano, C.F.
and
Savi, R.
(2004), “Experience gained from applying ISO/IEC 15504 to small software companies in Brazil”, Proceedings of the 4th International SPICE Conference on Process Assessment and Improvement, Portugal.
2. Antony, J.
(2004), “Some pros and cons of Six Sigma: an academic perspective”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 303-306.
3. Arnheiter, E.D.
and
Maleyeff, J.
(2005), “The integration of lean management and Six Sigma”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 5-18.
4. Assarlind, M.
,
Gremyr, I.
and
Bäckman, K.
(2012), “Multi-faceted views on a Lean Six Sigma application”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 21-30.
5. Band, W.A.
(1991), Creating Value for Customers, Wiley, New York, NY.
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献