The Delphi technique: a method for testing complex and multifaceted topics

Author:

Grisham Thomas

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide project management (PM) students with an example of the Delphi research approach that was applied to a recent doctoral research thesis. The objective is to provide both a description of the approach and an explanation of how it was successfully applied so that researchers in PM may become more aware and expand their perceptions of methodological options available to them.Design/methodology/approachThe paper sets out a literature review of the Delphi approach and explains this research method as it was experienced as a research tool. The paper also provides reflection on the experience of being a researcher undertaking a doctoral study.FindingsThe Delphi approach is one of many that may be selected for researching PM issues and problems. It is appropriate for researching complex issues where larger scale quantitative “hard data” fails to unearth richness in tacit knowledge to help the research understand subtle expert opinion. It does not offer the rigor of clinical testing or quantitative analysis, but it provides a scientific methodology that is well suited to issues that require the insights of subject matter experts. The use of Delphi in this context was successful in that the thesis was passed and so its use in this context may be now considered as proved through rigorous examination.Originality/valueThe paper provides a solid literature review that may be used or referred to by researchers wishing to adopt this research approach. It also describes the protocols and processes adopted in the doctoral study. Thus, this paper provides the opportunity for PM researchers to expand their repertoire of research tools. Practitioners may also benefit from this paper as it provides a useful approach to assess and validate expert knowledge that could be contestable in a range of practice situations.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,Business and International Management

Reference63 articles.

1. Addison, T. (2003), “E‐commerce project development risks: evidence from a Delphi survey”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 25‐40.

2. Bass, B.M. and Stogdill, R.M. (1990), Bass & Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications, 3rd ed., Free Press, New York, NY.

3. Beales, R. (2005), “Delphi creates fresh CDS challenge: a new cash‐settlement method for simplifying credit derivatives faces a stern test with the latest bankruptcy, writes Richard Beales (capital markets & commodities)”, The Financial Times, p. 43.

4. Bell, W. (1997), Foundations of Future Studies – Human Science for a New Era, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ.

5. Brancheau, J.C., Janz, B.D. and Wetherbe, J.C. (1996), “Key issues in information systems management: 1994‐95 SIM Delphi results”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20, pp. 225‐42.

Cited by 202 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3