Delphi Technique on Nursing Competence Studies: A Scoping Review

Author:

Furtado Luís12ORCID,Coelho Fábio2ORCID,Pina Sara1,Ganito Cátia1,Araújo Beatriz13ORCID,Ferrito Cândida14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Health Sciences and Nursing, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 1649-023 Lisboa, Portugal

2. Department of Nursing, Mental Health and Gerontology, School of Health, University of the Azores, 9700-042 Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal

3. Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Nursing, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal

4. Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 1649-023 Lisboa, Portugal

Abstract

This scoping review was conducted under the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework. It included primary studies published until 30 April 2023, obtained through a systematic search across PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and MEDLINE databases. The review focused on primary studies that used the Delphi technique in nursing competence research, especially those related to defining core competency frameworks and developing instruments to assess professional competence. The goal was to analyze the different methodological approaches used by authors, synthesize them, and propose recommendations to enhance methodological rigor, reliability, and validity in the application of the Delphi technique. For this purpose, the following review question was established: “What is the available evidence on the use of the Delphi technique in the study of professional competence in nursing?”. The extracted textual elements underwent a content analysis, resulting in dimensions established through an inductive approach. Twenty studies were included, yielding insights into diverse methodological options for conducting Delphi studies, organised around a set of dimensions: (1) preparatory procedures; (2) procedures for accessing and selecting experts; (3) acquisition of expert input; (4) data analysis and consensus; and (5) ethical and legal procedures and guarantees. The study’s limitations include the inability to include certain studies due to a lack of response to requests for clarification from corresponding authors. Additionally, the primary studies’ methodological quality was not assessed, which is another relevant aspect. The study’s results offer valuable insights for researchers intending to utilise the Delphi technique within the context of the research referenced in the included studies. This information encompasses important methodological choices, highlighting their potential benefits and associated risks. The review was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (Registration No: osf.io/kp2vw).

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference88 articles.

1. Le Boterf, G. (2006). Ingénierie et Évaluation des Compétences, Groupe Eyrolles. [5th ed.].

2. Benner, P. (2005). De Iniciado a Perito-Excelência e Poder na Prática Clínica de Enfermagem, Quarteto. Edição Comemorativa.

3. Comparison of nurse competence in different hospital work environments;Meretoja;J. Nurs. Manag.,2004

4. The development of competency standards for specialist critical care nurses;Dunn;J. Adv. Nurs.,2000

5. Pressure ulcer prevention: Development and psychometric validation of a knowledge assessment instrument;Beeckman;Int. J. Nurs. Stud.,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3