Author:
Daunt (née Reynolds) Kate L.,Greer Dominique A.
Abstract
Purpose
– This study aims to use opportunity as a theoretical lens to investigate how the spatio-temporal and social dimensions of the consumption environment create perceived opportunities for consumers to misbehave.
Design/methodology/approach
– Drawing on routine activity theory and social impact theory, the authors use two experiments to demonstrate that spatio-temporal and social dimensions can explain consumer theft in retail settings.
Findings
– Study 1 reveals mixed empirical support for the basic dimensions of routine activity theory, which posits that the opportunity to thieve is optimised when a motivated offender, suitable target and the absence of a capable formal guardian transpire in time and space. Extending the notion of guardianship, Study 2 tests social impact theory and shows that informal guardianship impacts the likelihood of theft under optimal routine activity conditions.
Originality/value
– The study findings highlight important implications for academicians and retail managers: rather than focusing on the uncontrollable characteristics of thieving offenders, more controllable spatio-temporal and social factors of the retail environment can be actively monitored and manipulated to reduce perceived opportunities for consumer misbehaviour.
Reference55 articles.
1. Al-Khatib, J.A.
,
Vitell, S.J.
and
Rawwas, M.Y.A.
(1997), “Consumer ethics: a cross-cultural investigation”,
European Journal of Marketing
, Vol. 31 Nos 11/12, pp. 750-767.
2. Amine, A.
and
Gicquel, Y.
(2011), “Rethinking resistance and anti-consumption behavioural in the light of the concept of deviance”,
European Journal of Marketing
, Vol. 45 Nos 11/12, pp. 1809-1819.
3. Argo, J.J.
,
Dahl, D.W.
and
Manchanda, R.Y.
(2005), “The influence of a mere social presence in a retail context”,
Journal of Consumer Research
, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 207-212.
4. Bergkvist, L.
and
Rossiter, J.R.
(2007), “The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs”,
Journal of Marketing Research
, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 175-184.
5. Berry, L.L.
and
Seiders, K.
(2008), “Serving unfair customers”,
Business Horizons
, Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 29-37.
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献