Author:
Smith Carly,Forrester-Jones Rachel
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to analyse the reflective journals kept by 62 students researching and interviewing people with learning disabilities. The aim was to explore the content and discover any themes that were generated throughout the journals as a result of the pre-, during- and post-interview process.
Design/methodology/approach
– The method used to analyse the journals was Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (Smith and Osborn, 2008).
Findings
– The results showed that there was a shift from negative to positive reflections as the frequency of contact with people with learning disabilities increased and that the majority of students reported a change in attitude towards this group of individuals after experiencing direct contact (two to three meetings over a period of two months).
Research limitations/implications
– Implications of the findings are for government policies, promoting social inclusion through education, to offer the opportunity for direct contact with people with learning disabilities, (in keeping with Allport's, 1954 Contact Theory) at an earlier stage in education, fostering an environment for earlier attitude change and increased social inclusion.
Social implications
– Changing society's attitude through our education system may decrease marginalisation by the public as well as discriminatory and abusive behaviour found in some social and community care settings.
Originality/value
– This piece of research may add value to social, government and educational policies. Finding an evidence base to continue to build policies for decreasing marginalisation and promoting social inclusion for people with learning disabilities.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Social Psychology,Phychiatric Mental Health
Reference36 articles.
1. Allport, G.W.
(1954), The Nature of Prejudice, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA.
2. Barnes, C.
(1991), Disabled People in Britain and Discrimination: A Case for Anti-Discrimination Legislation, Hurst & Co., London.
3. Basset, T.
(1999), “Involving service users in training”, Care: The Journal of Practice and Development, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 5-11.
4. Brewster, S.J.
(2004), “Putting words into their mouths? Interviewing people with learning disabilities and little/no speech”, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 166-9.
5. Cambridge, P.
and
Forrester-Jones, R.
(2003), “Using individualised communication for interviewing people with intellectual disability: a case study of user-centred research”, Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 5-23.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献