Primary care patient satisfaction segmentation
Author:
Qu Haiyan,Platonova Elena A.,Norman Kennedy Karen,Shewchuk Richard M.
Abstract
PurposeThe aim of this study is to examine patient satisfaction with non‐physician staff as related to patient demographics, satisfaction with physician, and intentions to recommend their physicians to others.Design/methodology/approachA survey was conducted at two internal medicine primary care clinics affiliated with a major university health system. A latent class analysis was used to detect patient subpopulations based on profiles of response for five satisfaction‐with‐staff indicators.FindingsThe response rate was 86.46 percent (479 of 554). Analyses revealed four patient subpopulation segments. Segment I (n=241) patients uniformly indicated a high level of satisfaction across the five satisfaction‐with‐staff indicators. These patients tended to be older and less educated, and have lower incomes relative to patients in other segments. Patients in Segment II (n=83) expressed satisfaction with staff caring and need accommodation, but dissatisfaction with access to their physicians. Patients in Segment III (n=51) indicated high levels of satisfaction with access and low levels of satisfaction with staff caring and need accommodation. Segment IV (n=104) patients uniformly expressed low levels of satisfaction across all indicators and generally were younger and more educated, as well as had higher incomes than other patients.Originality/valuePatients have different expectations from their non‐physician staff, e.g. younger, more affluent, and educated patients expressed dissatisfaction with staff. This suggests that non‐physician staff should provide extra/further responsiveness to have these patients' needs met. Generally, approaches that are differentially targeted to specific patient subgroups are likely to be more efficient and patient‐oriented than undifferentiated approaches.
Subject
Health Policy,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference37 articles.
1. Anderson, R., Weisman, C., Camacho, F., Scholle, H., Henderson, J. and Farmer, D. (2007), “Women's satisfaction with their on‐going primary health care services: a consideration of visit‐specific and period assessments”, Health Services Research, Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 663‐81. 2. Benkert, R., Barkauskas, V., Pohl, J., Corser, W., Tanner, C. and Nagelkirk, J. (2002), “Patient satisfaction outcomes in nurse‐managed centers”, Outcomes Management, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 174‐81. 3. Blendon, R.J., Brodie, M. and Benson, J.M. (2005), “Health policy”, in Best, S.J. and Radcliff, B. (Eds), Polling America: An Encyclopedia of Public Opinion, Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, pp. 289‐91. 4. Bowers, M., Swan, J.E. and Koehler, W.F. (1994), “What attributes determine quality and satisfaction with health care delivery?”, Health Care Management Review, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 49‐55. 5. Braunsberger, K. and Gates, R.H. (2002), “Patient/enrollee satisfaction with healthcare and health plan”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 7, pp. 575‐90.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|