Author:
Zeng Changli,Zhang Lu,Li Jiangtao
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of top management’s environmental responsibility audit (ERA) implementation on firms’ investment for environmental protection in China.
Design/methodology/approach
The sample comprises firms publicly traded on A-Share in China from 2011 to 2017. The authors used the ordinary least squares regression model to test the relation between ERA implementation and corporate environmental investment.
Findings
Firms’ environmental investment increases significantly after the ERA implementation. Compared to state-owned enterprises (SOEs), non-state-owned enterprises (non-SOEs) are more likely to increase their environmental investment after ERA implementation. Moreover, such change is more likely for non-heavily polluting enterprises (non-HPEs) compared to heavily polluting enterprises (HPEs).
Practical implications
This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the positive influence of environmental enforcement on corporate behavior, which could serve as reference for regulators on the latest environmental accounting practice in China and other emerging economies.
Social implications
This paper shows that clear assignment of environmental responsibility and subsequent assessment of environmental performance are contributing factors to effective and efficient implementation of an environmental management system.
Originality/value
Contributing to accounting and environmental management literature, this paper explains how mandated environmental audit incentivizes firms to deal with environmental issues. Because there is no prior research concerning the mandatory implementation of environmental audit in China, this paper is of high-innovatory value by providing a better understanding of environmental auditing and providing an economic explanation for government intervention as an effective means of mitigating environmental degradation in emerging economies.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference100 articles.
1. Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication;Accounting, Organizations and Society,2009
2. Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview;The Academy of Management Perspectives,2008
3. Credit supply and corporate innovation;Journal of Financial Economics,2013
4. Does corporate social responsibility reduce the costs of high leverage? Evidence from Capital structure and product market interactions;Journal of Banking and Finance,2019
5. Talking trash: legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment;Academy of Management Journal,2004
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献