Abstract
PurposeThis study empirically evaluates the effect of China’s 2016 Green Financial System (GFS) framework on corporate green development, focusing on the role of green investment in achieving sustainability.Design/methodology/approachThis study uses a quasinatural experiment design to combine difference-in-difference and propensity score matching methods for analysis. It examines 799 polluting and 1,130 nonpolluting firms from 2013 to 2020, enabling a comprehensive assessment of the GFS framework’s influence.FindingsThis study affirms a statistically significant positive influence of the GFS framework on escalating green investment levels in polluting firms. Robust sensitivity analyses, encompassing parallel trend assessment, entropy balancing test, and alternative proxies, corroborate these findings. A mediation analysis identifies the implementation of an environmental management system as the potential underlying mechanism. A cross-sectional analysis identifies high financial slack, high profitability, mandatory CSR regulations, and marketization level as the influencing factors.Research limitations/implicationsThe study’s findings have critical implications for policymakers, regulators, and companies. Demonstrating the effectiveness of the GFS framework in driving green investment underscores the importance of aligning financial systems with sustainability goals.Originality/valueThis study contributes novel empirical evidence on the positive effect of China’s GFS framework on corporate green development. The quasinatural experiment design, coupled with comprehensive sensitivity analyses, strengthens the robustness of the findings.
Reference82 articles.
1. Investment in renewable energy and electricity output: role of green finance, environmental tax, and geopolitical risk: empirical evidence from China;Energy,2023
2. A review of studies on green finance of banks, research gaps and future directions;Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment,2022
3. Firm sustainable investment: are female directors greener?;Business Strategy and the Environment,2020
4. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986
5. The European Commission's Green Deal is an opportunity to rethink harmful practices of research and innovation policy;Ambio,2023