Developing a methodology for assessing virtual teams’ performance perception

Author:

Gustavo Siqueira Ferreira Pedro,Pinheiro de Lima Edson,Gouvea da Costa Sergio E.

Abstract

PurposeThe main purpose of this paper is to describe and test a methodology to measure the level of comprehension of priorities in performance measurement systems by virtual teams.Design/methodology/approachThrough the combination of existing models for performance measurement, a methodology of using focus groups for identifying virtual team's performance perceptions and comprehension is proposed and tested.FindingsPreliminary findings show that virtual teams could express their perception about companies’ goals and performance requirements, and could also improve their commitment to companies’ operations strategy by performance gaps assessment.Research limitations/implicationsThe proposed methodology was tested in a portion of a team just to validate the applicability of such methodology.Practical implicationsPreliminary findings show that virtual teams could express their perception about companies’ goals and performance requirements, and could also improve their commitment to companies’ operations strategy by performance gaps assessment.Originality/valueLiterature is scant both on gender issues in performance measurement, as well as on virtual teams. This paper contributes to both areas, while evaluating the impact of such methodology in virtual teams.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference80 articles.

1. Ahuja, M.K. and Galvin, J.E. (2001), “Socialization in virtual groups”, Journal of Management, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 161‐85.

2. Albrecht, T.L., Johnson, G.M. and Walther, J.B. (1993), “Understanding communication processes in focus groups, in Morgan, D.L. (Ed.), Sucessful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of Art, Sage, London.

3. Ale Ebrahim, N., Ahmed, S. and Taha, Z. (2009), “‘Innovation and RandD activities in virtual team’. [Literature review]”, European Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 297‐307.

4. Andres, H.P. (2002), “A comparison of face‐to‐face and virtual software development teams”, Team Performance Management: An International Journal, Vol. 8 Nos 1‐2, pp. 39‐48.

5. Arnison, L. and Miller, P. (2002), “Virtual teams: a virtue for the conventional team”, Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 166‐73.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3