Author:
Greatbanks Richard,Elkin Graham,Manville Graham
Abstract
PurposeThis research paper seeks to examine the important issues of performance measurement and reporting in a third sector community organisation. It aims to highlight the dysfunctional nature of funding body performance reporting criteria, which do not always align with the values and goals of the voluntary organisation. In contrast, this paper aims to consider the value of using anecdotal performance data to provide a more informed perspective on the performance of third sector organisations.Design/methodology/approachThe paper examines the current literature regarding performance measurement from a voluntary sector perspective. It then considers the value and efficacy of anecdotal performance reporting and presents empirical findings from a single case study organisation.FindingsThe paper identifies that many forms of performance reporting frameworks used by funding bodies provide little or no value to the voluntary organisation, and that anecdotal performance reporting is often more aligned with the values of the voluntary organisation. This paper proposes that whilst anecdotal performance reporting is not common place, it has an inherent value to both a third sector organisation, and funding body, as it allows the organisation's achievements to be presented in a more empathic light. The paper concludes that anecdotal performance reporting is particularly appropriate where the funding body is of a philanthropic, rather than government or state nature.Research limitations/implicationsThis research was conducted from the perspective of one voluntary sector organisation, therefore providing limited generalizability.Originality/valueWith little research undertaken on the value of anecdotal performance reporting in this environment, this paper highlights a potential new area of performance measurement. This research is set within a New Zealand context, adding to the originality.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference43 articles.
1. Baxter, J. and Chau, W.F. (2003), “Alternative management and accounting research – whence and whither”, Accounting, Organizations, and Society, Vol. 28, pp. 97‐126.
2. Bititci, U.S., Carrie, A.S. and McDevitt, L. (1997), “Integrated performance measurement systems: a development guide”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 522‐34.
3. Brignall, S. and Modell, S. (2000), “An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the ‘new public sector’”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, pp. 281‐306.
4. Cairns, B., Harris, M., Hutchinson, R. and Tricker, M. (2005), “Improving performance? The adoption and implementation of quality systems in UK nonprofits”, Non‐profit Management and Leadership, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 135‐51.
5. Crampton, P., Woodward, A. and Dowell, A. (2001), “The role of third sector in providing primary care services – theoretical and policy issues”, Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, Vol. 17, pp. 1‐21.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献