Author:
Soderberg Marvin,Kalagnanam Suresh,Sheehan Norman T.,Vaidyanathan Ganesh
Abstract
PurposeThe Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is widely applied as a performance measurement and strategy implementation tool by organizations. Research has revealed that the term “balanced scorecard” may be understood differently by managers both within as well as across organizations implying that the performance measurement systems implemented in organizations may not be similar to the construct envisioned by Kaplan and Norton. Using Kaplan and Norton's Balanced Scorecard construct as a basis, the paper aims to develop and test a five‐level taxonomy to classify firms' performance measurement systems.Design/methodology/approachA Balanced Scorecard taxonomy is validated using a large sample of professional accountants working in Canadian organizations.FindingsThe five‐level taxonomy is used to categorize the performance measurement systems of 149 organizations. It is found that 111 organizations' (74.5 percent) performance measurement systems met the criteria to be classified as a Basic Level 1 BSC, while 61 (40.9 percent) organizations have structurally complete Level 3 BSCs, and 36 (24.2 percent) organizations have fully developed Level 5 BSCs. The paper also discusses differences between Level 1 and Level 5 BSC organizations.Research limitations/implicationsWhile many researchers assume that organizations' performance measurement systems are similar in implementation level and use, the paper demonstrates that organizations are at different levels of BSC implementation and use, a factor that should be taken into consideration when designing empirical studies to test the efficacy of Kaplan and Norton's BSC.Practical implicationsThe five‐level BSC taxonomy scheme provides managers working with Kaplan and Norton's BSC with a tool to plan their implementation steps and then benchmark their progress towards implementing a fully developed Level 5 BSC.Originality/valueIn developing and empirically validating a BSC taxonomy, the paper builds on and extends previous research on BSC implementation and its potential implications.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference46 articles.
1. Anthony, R.N. and Govindarajan, V. (2007), Management Control Systems, 12th ed., McGraw‐Hill Irwin, Burr Ridge, IL.
2. Argyris, C. (1991), “Teaching smart people how to learn”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69 No. 3, pp. 99‐109.
3. Babbie, E.R. (1990), Survey Research Methods, 2nd ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
4. Banker, R.D., Chang, H. and Pizzini, M.J. (2004), “The Balanced Scorecard: judgmental effects of performance measures linked to strategy”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 79 No. 1, pp. 1‐23.
5. Bourne, M. (2008), “Performance measurement: learning from the past and projecting the future”, Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 67‐72.
Cited by
44 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献