When is a balanced scorecard a balanced scorecard?

Author:

Soderberg Marvin,Kalagnanam Suresh,Sheehan Norman T.,Vaidyanathan Ganesh

Abstract

PurposeThe Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is widely applied as a performance measurement and strategy implementation tool by organizations. Research has revealed that the term “balanced scorecard” may be understood differently by managers both within as well as across organizations implying that the performance measurement systems implemented in organizations may not be similar to the construct envisioned by Kaplan and Norton. Using Kaplan and Norton's Balanced Scorecard construct as a basis, the paper aims to develop and test a five‐level taxonomy to classify firms' performance measurement systems.Design/methodology/approachA Balanced Scorecard taxonomy is validated using a large sample of professional accountants working in Canadian organizations.FindingsThe five‐level taxonomy is used to categorize the performance measurement systems of 149 organizations. It is found that 111 organizations' (74.5 percent) performance measurement systems met the criteria to be classified as a Basic Level 1 BSC, while 61 (40.9 percent) organizations have structurally complete Level 3 BSCs, and 36 (24.2 percent) organizations have fully developed Level 5 BSCs. The paper also discusses differences between Level 1 and Level 5 BSC organizations.Research limitations/implicationsWhile many researchers assume that organizations' performance measurement systems are similar in implementation level and use, the paper demonstrates that organizations are at different levels of BSC implementation and use, a factor that should be taken into consideration when designing empirical studies to test the efficacy of Kaplan and Norton's BSC.Practical implicationsThe five‐level BSC taxonomy scheme provides managers working with Kaplan and Norton's BSC with a tool to plan their implementation steps and then benchmark their progress towards implementing a fully developed Level 5 BSC.Originality/valueIn developing and empirically validating a BSC taxonomy, the paper builds on and extends previous research on BSC implementation and its potential implications.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference46 articles.

1. Anthony, R.N. and Govindarajan, V. (2007), Management Control Systems, 12th ed., McGraw‐Hill Irwin, Burr Ridge, IL.

2. Argyris, C. (1991), “Teaching smart people how to learn”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69 No. 3, pp. 99‐109.

3. Babbie, E.R. (1990), Survey Research Methods, 2nd ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

4. Banker, R.D., Chang, H. and Pizzini, M.J. (2004), “The Balanced Scorecard: judgmental effects of performance measures linked to strategy”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 79 No. 1, pp. 1‐23.

5. Bourne, M. (2008), “Performance measurement: learning from the past and projecting the future”, Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 67‐72.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3