The impact of performance management on the results of a non‐profit organization

Author:

de Waal André,Goedegebuure Robert,Geradts Patricia

Abstract

PurposeIn recent years many organizations have implemented performance management because this technique leads to better organizational results as reported in many articles and case studies. However, often the reported improvement relates to qualitative performance and there is little solid empirical evidence of the actual effects performance management has on the quantitative results of organizations. This article aims to describe the results of a study that explored the quantitative impact of performance management on the results of a non‐profit organization.Design/methodology/approachQuantitative performance data of the organization, before and after the introduction of performance management, were collected and linked to key activities and events that occurred in the organization during and after the implementation.FindingsThe research shows that several key activities related to the introduction of performance management have an impact on the results of an organization although not always in an expected positive way.Research limitations/implicationsA research limitation is that it is always difficult to isolate the effects of a particular event on the overall results of an organization. Although the effects of other events have been taken into account, it cannot be ruled out that unlisted events and factors are in play.Practical implicationsThe results support managers who want to introduce performance management to improve the results of their non‐profit organisation. At the same time, the research indicates that introducing and using performance management needs continuous attention of management in order to become and stay successful in the long run.Originality/valueThis article contributes to the literature as it is one of the few longitudinal research studies into the effects of performance management, specifically in non‐profit organizations.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference48 articles.

1. Adcroft, A. and Willis, R. (2005), “The (un)intended outcome of public sector performance measurement”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 8 No. 5, pp. 386‐400.

2. Ahn, H. (2001), “Applying the balanced scorecard concept: an experience report”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 34, pp. 441‐61.

3. Andersen, H.V. and Lawrie, G. (2002), “Examining opportunities for improving public sector governance through better strategic management”, in Neely, A., Walters, A. and Austin, R. (Eds), Performance Measurement and Management: Research and Action, Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield.

4. Armstrong, M. and Baron, A. (1998), Performance Management, the New Realities, Institute of Personnel and Development, London.

5. Banker, R.D., Potter, G. and Srinivasan, D. (2000), “An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes non‐financial performance measures”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 75 No. 1, pp. 65‐92.

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3