Manipulating search engine algorithms: the case of Google

Author:

Bar‐Ilan Judit

Abstract

PurposeTo investigate how search engine users manipulate the rankings of search results. Search engines employ different ranking methods in order to display the “best” results first. One of the ranking methods is PageRank, where the number of links pointing to the page influences its rank. The “anchor text,” the clickable text of the hypertext link is another “ingredient” in the ranking method. There are a number of cases where the public challenged the Google's ranking, by creating a so‐called “Google bomb” – creating links to pages they wanted to be highly ranked for given query. Google is chosen as the search engine, because it is currently by far the most popular search engine.Design/methodology/approachPageRank, one of the major parameters of Google's ranking algorithm is described, and the author explains how this algorithm is exploited by communities of users to promote a certain web page for a specific query. This process is called “Google bombing.” Recent reaction of Google to this phenomenon is also described.FindingsSpecific examples of “accomplished Google bombs” show that the public is able to manipulate search results.Originality/valueGoogle, instead of being an unobtrusive information retrieval tool has become highly influential in the web scenery. Some users pay for search engine optimization, while others utilize the power of the crowd to influence Google's rankings. This paper supports the claims of Introna and Nissenbaum regarding the power of search engines.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy,Communication

Reference52 articles.

1. Ashkenazi, J. (2004), “No. 1 Google result for ‘Jew’ is a fanatical hate site – for now”, The Jewish News Weekly of Northern California, March 15, available at: www.jewishsf.com/content/2‐0‐/module/displaystory/story_id/21783/format/html/displaystory.html (accessed July 7, 2007).

2. Baeza‐Yates, R.A. and Ribeiro‐Neto, B. (1999), Modern Information Retrieval, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

3. Bar‐Ilan, J. (2006), “Web links and search engine ranking: the case of Google and the query ‘jew’”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 57 No. 12, pp. 1581‐9.

4. Bar‐Ilan, J. (2007), “Google bombing from a time perspective”, Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 910‐38.

5. BBC (2003), “‘Miserable failure’ links to Bush”, available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3298443.stm (accessed July 7, 2007).

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3