Abstract
PurposeThis study examines how perceived organizational justice mediates the relationship between talent management (TM) and non-high potential employees (NHPE) outcomes (i.e. affective commitment, job satisfaction, and the intention to leave) in the public sector, thereby clarifying the underlying mechanisms.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted a causal mediation analysis of the findings of a scenario-based survey with 748 public-sector NHPEs by adopting a post-test experimental design.FindingsPerceived distributive justice and perceived procedural justice mediated the relationships among equal resource distribution/TM procedures and NHPE outcomes, respectively.Originality/valueThis study extends and clarifies the argument for fairness judgments based on the gap in resource allocation and the presence or absence of the six rules of procedural justice that affect the attitudes and behaviors of NHPEs, who are generally more affected by TM but underexplored, in the public sector in which NHPEs are considered to be more sensitive to TM due to the egalitarian culture of public sector.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference67 articles.
1. Human resources management practices and organizational commitment in higher education: the mediating role of work engagement;International Journal of Educational Management,2020
2. Towards an understanding of inequity;Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,1963
3. The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: a test of mediation;Journal of Applied Psychology,2009
4. Reexamining the workplace justice to outcome relationship: does frame of reference matter?;Journal of Management Studies,2012
5. What determines people’s fairness judgments? Identification and outcomes influence procedural justice evaluations under uncertainty;Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2007
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献