Author:
Georgiou Aris,Haritos George,Fowler Moyra,Imani Yasmin
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to focus on how the concept design stage of a powertrain system can be improved by using a purely objective driven approach in selecting a final concept design to progress further. This research investigation will examine the development of a novel test-bed to assist in the selection of powertrain technologies during the concept design phase at Ford Motor Company Ltd, serving as the main contribution to knowledge.
Design/methodology/approach
– The objectives of this research were achieved by carrying out a literature review of external published work related to concept design evaluation methods within product development and value engineering techniques. Empirical studies were conducted with a supporting case study used to test the application of a new test-bed to improve the concept design decision process.
Findings
– A quantitative new tool “Product Optimisation Value Engineering” (PROVEN) is presented to critically assess new and evolving powertrain technologies at the concept design phase.
Research limitations/implications
– This research improves the concept design selection process, hence increasing the product value to the customer.
Practical implications
– The new test-bed “PROVEN” incorporates a data-driven objective approach to assist in assessing concept design alternatives in providing the net value in terms of function and cost as perceived by the customer.
Originality/value
– A mathematical new test-bed that incorporates a highly adaptable, data-driven and multi-attribute value approach to product specification and conceptual design is developed, novel to the automotive concept design process. This will create a substantially optimised product offering to the market, reducing overall development costs while achieving customer satisfaction. The new tool has the ability to define a technology value map to assess multiple technical options as a function of its attributes, whose precise values can be determined at a given cost.
Reference25 articles.
1. Allen, K.R.
and
Skalak, C.
(1998), “A variation-based methodology for product family design”, ASME 2000 Design Engineering Technical Conferences, pp. 28-34.
2. Backman, M.
,
Borjesson, S.
and
Setterberg, S.
(2007), “Working with concepts in the fuzzy front end: exploring the context for innovation for different types of concepts at Volvo Cars”,
R&D Management
, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 17-28.
3. Bragd, A.
(2002),
Knowing Management: an Ethnographic Study of Tinkering with a New Car
, Bas Publisher, Gothenburg.
4. Cook, H.
(1997),
Product Management: Value, Quality, Cost, Price, Profit and Organisation
, Chapman
&
Hall, London.
5. Donndelinger, J.
,
Cafeo, J.
and
Nagel, R.
(2009), “An exploratory study of simulated decision-making in preliminary vehicle design”,
Journal of Product Research
, Springer, pp. 113-133.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献