Advanced phase powertrain design attribute and technology value mapping

Author:

Georgiou Aris,Haritos George,Fowler Moyra,Imani Yasmin

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to focus on how the concept design stage of a powertrain system can be improved by using a purely objective driven approach in selecting a final concept design to progress further. This research investigation will examine the development of a novel test-bed to assist in the selection of powertrain technologies during the concept design phase at Ford Motor Company Ltd, serving as the main contribution to knowledge. Design/methodology/approach – The objectives of this research were achieved by carrying out a literature review of external published work related to concept design evaluation methods within product development and value engineering techniques. Empirical studies were conducted with a supporting case study used to test the application of a new test-bed to improve the concept design decision process. Findings – A quantitative new tool “Product Optimisation Value Engineering” (PROVEN) is presented to critically assess new and evolving powertrain technologies at the concept design phase. Research limitations/implications – This research improves the concept design selection process, hence increasing the product value to the customer. Practical implications – The new test-bed “PROVEN” incorporates a data-driven objective approach to assist in assessing concept design alternatives in providing the net value in terms of function and cost as perceived by the customer. Originality/value – A mathematical new test-bed that incorporates a highly adaptable, data-driven and multi-attribute value approach to product specification and conceptual design is developed, novel to the automotive concept design process. This will create a substantially optimised product offering to the market, reducing overall development costs while achieving customer satisfaction. The new tool has the ability to define a technology value map to assess multiple technical options as a function of its attributes, whose precise values can be determined at a given cost.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Engineering

Reference25 articles.

1. Allen, K.R. and Skalak, C. (1998), “A variation-based methodology for product family design”, ASME 2000 Design Engineering Technical Conferences, pp. 28-34.

2. Backman, M. , Borjesson, S. and Setterberg, S. (2007), “Working with concepts in the fuzzy front end: exploring the context for innovation for different types of concepts at Volvo Cars”, R&D Management , Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 17-28.

3. Bragd, A. (2002), Knowing Management: an Ethnographic Study of Tinkering with a New Car , Bas Publisher, Gothenburg.

4. Cook, H. (1997), Product Management: Value, Quality, Cost, Price, Profit and Organisation , Chapman & Hall, London.

5. Donndelinger, J. , Cafeo, J. and Nagel, R. (2009), “An exploratory study of simulated decision-making in preliminary vehicle design”, Journal of Product Research , Springer, pp. 113-133.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A framework for design optimization across multiple concepts;Scientific Reports;2024-04-03

2. Gas turbine cost and value management in the conceptual design stage;International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM);2022-01-10

3. DATA-DRIVEN DESIGN IN CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND MISSED OPPORTUNITIES;Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference;2020-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3