Accounting for disasters

Author:

Agyenim-Boateng Cletus,Oduro-Boateng Kofi

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate disaster accountability process, and it seeks to advocate for involvement of victims as salient stakeholders in the accountability process. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopt a case study of the 3rd June, 2015 flood disaster and fire that occurred in Accra, Ghana and draw mainly on interviews, as well as observations and a review of publicly available documents. Findings Several actors are involved in disaster management in Ghana. These actors play several roles as part of the disaster management process. Coordination is observed among some governmental actors. However, there is a little collaboration among these actors. There are, therefore, no clear accountability relationships between the actors. Moreover, the forms of accountability process are largely upward and internal. So, although we find the victims as salient stakeholders, their perspectives are not prioritised as part of the accountability process. Research limitations/implications As a result of less engagement with victims in the accountability process, a central accountability concern, outcomes, namely, benefits for victims in terms of changes in their knowledge, status, attitudes, values, skills, behaviours or conditions were not promoted. Downward accountability should be encouraged to promote better outcomes. Originality/value Although some studies on accounting for disasters have been undertaken, there is none in our local context, and also this study has been able to uncover under-representation of victims in the accountability process using adaptive accountability lens.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Development,Accounting

Reference70 articles.

1. Seeking ‘conversations for accountability’: mediating the impact of non-governmental organization (NGO) upward accountability processes;Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,2017

2. The role of structure in manipulating PPP accountability;Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,2017

3. Alexander, D. (2006), “Symbolic and practical interpretations of the Hurricane Katrina disaster in new orleans”, Social Science Research Council, understanding Katrina, 11 June, available at: http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Alexander (accessed 23 February 2016).

4. Baker, C.R. (2014), “Breakdowns of accountability in the face of natural disasters: the case of Hurricane Katrina”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 25 No. 7, pp. 620-632.

5. Problems of inference and proof in participant observation;American Sociological Review,1958

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3