Author:
Agyenim-Boateng Cletus,Oduro-Boateng Kofi
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate disaster accountability process, and it seeks to advocate for involvement of victims as salient stakeholders in the accountability process.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors adopt a case study of the 3rd June, 2015 flood disaster and fire that occurred in Accra, Ghana and draw mainly on interviews, as well as observations and a review of publicly available documents.
Findings
Several actors are involved in disaster management in Ghana. These actors play several roles as part of the disaster management process. Coordination is observed among some governmental actors. However, there is a little collaboration among these actors. There are, therefore, no clear accountability relationships between the actors. Moreover, the forms of accountability process are largely upward and internal. So, although we find the victims as salient stakeholders, their perspectives are not prioritised as part of the accountability process.
Research limitations/implications
As a result of less engagement with victims in the accountability process, a central accountability concern, outcomes, namely, benefits for victims in terms of changes in their knowledge, status, attitudes, values, skills, behaviours or conditions were not promoted. Downward accountability should be encouraged to promote better outcomes.
Originality/value
Although some studies on accounting for disasters have been undertaken, there is none in our local context, and also this study has been able to uncover under-representation of victims in the accountability process using adaptive accountability lens.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Development,Accounting
Reference70 articles.
1. Seeking ‘conversations for accountability’: mediating the impact of non-governmental organization (NGO) upward accountability processes;Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,2017
2. The role of structure in manipulating PPP accountability;Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,2017
3. Alexander, D. (2006), “Symbolic and practical interpretations of the Hurricane Katrina disaster in new orleans”, Social Science Research Council, understanding Katrina, 11 June, available at: http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Alexander (accessed 23 February 2016).
4. Baker, C.R. (2014), “Breakdowns of accountability in the face of natural disasters: the case of Hurricane Katrina”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 25 No. 7, pp. 620-632.
5. Problems of inference and proof in participant observation;American Sociological Review,1958
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献