Metadata quality in learning object repositories: a case study

Author:

Palavitsinis Nikolaos,Manouselis Nikos,Sanchez-Alonso Salvador

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to address the issue of poor quality of metadata records describing educational content in Learning Object Repositories (LORs). Through this, it aims to improve the discoverability of learning objects in such LORs through a structured process that supports metadata creation. Design/methodology/approach – This paper presents a proposed metadata quality assessment certification process for LORs. The process was designed as a generic approach that may be customized to fit various application domains. Findings – Initial results from the application of the process in the context of a specific LOR report an improvement of the quality of about 11,000 metadata records. More specifically, metadata completeness for all metadata elements used in the repository under examination was significantly improved from 30 percent to 85 percent. Research limitations/implications – The main limitation of the findings is that they come from the application of the proposed process on a relatively small repository, which does not allow safe generalizations without further experimental study in bigger ones where resources and requirements scale up. Practical implications – This paper addresses implications for the development of a repository in the educational domain, identifying issues related to the metadata application profile, the support to domain experts and the mechanisms that may be put in place to support metadata creation. Originality/value – The value and also the originality of the approach presented lies within the fact the proposed approach quantifies issues related to metadata creation and management by studying actions and perceptions of stakeholders who are involved in the repository lifecycle.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications

Reference53 articles.

1. Adamick, J. (2010), “Trends in large-scale subject repositories”, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 16 Nos 11/12.

2. ADL (2002), Advanced Distributed Learning, available at: www.adlnet.org.

3. Alkhattabi, M. , Neagu, D. and Cullen, A. (2010), “Information quality framework for e-learning systems”, Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 340-362.

4. Al-Khalifa, H.S. and Davis, H.C. (2004), “The evolution of metadata from standards to semantics in elearning applications”, in Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Odense, Denmark.

5. ARL Digital Repository Issues Task Force (2009), The Research Library's Role in Digital Repository Services: Final Report of the ARL Digital Repository Issues Task Force, January, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC.

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Design of a conversational recommender system in education;User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction;2024-06-21

2. Exploring dimensions of metadata quality assessment: A scoping review;Journal of Librarianship and Information Science;2024-03-24

3. Public Demand Oriented Quality Evaluation Model for Rainstorm Disaster Information Disclosure;ITM Web of Conferences;2024

4. Metadata matters: evaluating the quality of Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) descriptions in Malaysian institutional repositories;Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science;2023-05-11

5. Using e-Learning Standards to Improve Serious Game Deployment and Evaluation;2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON);2022-03-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3