Research consultation effectiveness for freshman and senior undergraduate students

Author:

Faix Allison,MacDonald Amanda,Taxakis Brooke

Abstract

Purpose – The aim of this paper is to compare the effectiveness of library research consultations for freshmen and senior undergraduate students, to determine if freshmen or seniors benefit more from these sessions. Design/methodology/approach – This study looks at the results of a survey conducted with students enrolled in a senior level capstone research course and in a freshman level composition course who were required to attend library research consultations. Findings – The study finds that freshman students can be overwhelmed by the amount of resources a research consultation may help them locate, and research consultations for freshmen should be conducted with this in mind. Research limitations/implications – Because the size of our study was small, further research with a larger sample size should also be conducted. Practical implications – If librarians experience high demand for required research consultations, and have difficulty scheduling sessions, then they may take into consideration that senior students benefit more from consultations than freshmen. Research consultations should also be designed to take student class rank into account. Originality/value – This study shows that upper-level students benefit more from research consultation than freshman students. Librarians should take this research into consideration when consulting with faculty about the most effective methods of instruction for students.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference10 articles.

1. Avery, S. , Hahn, J. and Zilic, M. (2008), “Beyond consultation: a new model for librarian's office hours”, Public Services Quarterly, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 187-206, available at: www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15228950802096719 (accessed May 16, 2012).

2. Cardwell, C. , Furlong, K. and O'Keeffe, J. (2001), “My librarian: personalized research clinics and the academic library”, Research Strategies, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 97-111, available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0734331002000721.

3. Donegan, P. , Domas, R. and Deosdale, J. (1989), “The comparable effects of term paper counseling and group instruction sessions”, College and Research Libraries, Vol. 50, pp. 195-205.

4. Gale, C.D. and Evans, B.S. (2007), “Face-to-face: the implementation and analysis of a research consultation service”, College & Undergraduate Libraries, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 85-101. available at: 10.1300/J106v14n03�.

5. Kohl, D.F. (1984), “Library administrator's view”, Research Strategies, Vol. 2, pp. 6-11.

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3