Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the effect that a prospective pathway college affiliated to a large comprehensive university in Sydney may have on the university's reputation. In particular, the association of reputation with preference for a pathway college, brand awareness and the opinion of college brand are examined.Design/methodology/approachAn online survey was conducted in metropolitan Sydney, Australia, and produced 501 questionnaires responses. A correlation study was used to analyse the relationship between variables of preference for college, perceived reputation, brand awareness and opinion of college brand.FindingsThe community reacted positively to a prospective college by agreeing that its merit is in providing a second chance for disadvantaged students and added to the diversity profile of the university. Reputation predicted brand awareness, preference for the college and the opinion of the college brand. Teaching quality of the college is found to be the most important factor to enhance the reputation of the university as well as brand.Originality/valueThe paper explores the difference and relationship between reputation and brand awareness in a higher education context and how this influenced students' decisions. This knowledge has useful implications for higher education management practice.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education
Reference55 articles.
1. Go8 (2007), “Seizing the opportunities”, Group of Eight policy discussion paper, June 6, available at: www.go8.edu.au/policy/current.htm.
2. Alfred, R.L. and Horowitz, M. (1990), “Higher education and public perception: dynamic of institutional stature”, Journal of Higher Education Management, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 7‐28.
3. AQF (2008), Australian Qualification Framework, available at: www.aqf.edu.au/register.htm#university (accessed April, 2008).
4. Archer, L. (2007), “Diversity, equality and higher education: a critical reflection on the abuses of equity discourse within widening participation”, Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 12 Nos 5/6, pp. 635‐53.
5. Archer, L. and Hutchings, M. (2000), “‘Bettering yourself’ discourses of risk, cost and benefit in ethnically diverse, young working class non‐participants' constructions of higher education”, British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 555‐74.
Cited by
47 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献