Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is twofold: to identify and explore the reasons why organisations decide to use process mapping software (PMS) facilities in support of business process management (BPM); and to determine the objectives set by senior management for its introduction, and understand extent to which organisations achieve expected benefits.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper uses an exploratory research design and investigates the elements of organisations’ objectives, implementation and evaluation of using PMS. The research data were collected through semi-structured interviews with business managers responsible for the implementation of PMS. The respondent organisations were selected from a range of industries who were using the same software.
Findings
The results of the research show that organisations do set objectives for using PMS, relevant to a wide range of business, operational and strategic objectives, dependant on the needs of the organisation. Additionally, the results show that some gain further advantages post-implementation, based on their PMS experience. Regarding explicit evaluation of their investment, organisations attempt this to a very limited extent; whilst recognising a broad a range of “softer” benefits.
Research limitations/implications
This exploratory research has been conducted on a small range of organisations, all using the same software, therefore the results cannot be clearly generalizable. The research suggests organisations are making effective decisions regarding adopting PMS, further research on the evaluating its benefits could support better decision-making in the future.
Practical implications
The practical implications of this research are for decision-makers in organisations recognising and understanding the strategic/operational benefits that could be achieved by implementing a software system for BPM.
Originality/value
Whilst the use of process mapping of organisation’s operations is widespread the benefits achieved by organisations are only partially understood. Knowledge of the strategic impact of BPM is limited, as reported by numerous researchers. This research attempts to explore the context of organisations using such software, and point towards further approaches to its investigation.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference40 articles.
1. Bandara, W., Guillermain, A. and Coogans, P. (2010), “Prioritising process improvement: an example from the Australian financial services sector”, in vom Brocke, J. and Rosemann, M. (Eds), Handbook on Business Process Management 2: Strategic Alignment, Governance, People and Culture, Springer, Berlin, pp. 177-195.
2. Barreto, A. and Rocha, A. (2010), “Defining and monitoring strategically aligned software improvements goals”, in Ali Baber, M. and Oivo, M. (Eds), Product Focussed Software Process Improvement, Vol. 6156, Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg, pp. 380-394.
3. The joint impact of service-oriented architectures and business process management on business process quality: an empirical evaluation and comparison;Information Systems & e-Business Management,2011
4. Dynamic or static capabilities? Process management practices and response to technical change;Journal of Product Innovation Management,2009
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献