Occupational identity of staff and attitudes towards institutional closure
Author:
T. Vesala Hannu,Teittinen Antti,Heinonen Pilvikki
Abstract
Purpose
– Deinstitutionalization has impacts also on direct care workers and their work. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the attitudes of direct care workers towards the closure of the institution, and these attitudes’ relation to workers’ occupational identity.
Design/methodology/approach
– Data were collected by postal questionnaire before the closure of the institution. The respondents consisted of two groups: direct care workers of the institution (n=93) and direct care workers of community-based residential units run by the same organization (n=117).
Findings
– The results clearly show that direct care workers in the institution, as a group, were against the closure of the institution. This is quite understandable, because the closure will irrevocably affect their work and also private life. Although this opposing is evident, there was also variance in the attitudes within this group: some were more willing to accept the change, some were more against it. Those opposing the closure seemed to be more reluctant in adopting the new kind of identity as supporters of the self-determination of their clients and also they felt more insecure about their own competence.
Originality/value
– In deinstitutionalization research a staff perspective has not been very common. To successfully accomplish the change process it is important to take into account also the staff and how they experience the change. It would be far more beneficial to have staff promoting change than resisting it.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Social Psychology,Pshychiatric Mental Health
Reference29 articles.
1. Augoustinos, M.
and
Walker, I.
(1995), Social Cognition. An Integrated Introduction, Sage Publications, London. 2. Bigby, C.
and
Fyffe, C.
(2006), “Tensions between institutional closure and deinstitutionalization: what can be learned from Victoria's institutional redevelopment”, Disability and Society, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 567-81. 3. Bigby, C.
,
Clement, T.
,
Mansell, J.
and
Beadle-Brown, J.
(2009), “It's pretty hard with our ones, they can’t talk, the more able bodied can participate’: staff attitudes about the applicability of disability policies to people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities”, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Vol. 54 No. 4, pp. 363-76. 4. Bradley, V.J.
(1994), “Evolution of a new service paradigm”, in
Bradley, V.J.
,
Asbaugh, J.W.
and
Blaney, B.C.
(Eds), Creating Individual Supports for People with Developmental Disabilities. A Mandate for Change at Many Levels, Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co., Baltimore, MA, pp. 11-32. 5. Cohen, J.
(1988), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|