Author:
Mari Ainikki Anttila Ulla
Abstract
Purpose
– Contemporary armed conflicts predominantly take place in developing countries and there are often non-state actors involved in them. Civilians have been deliberately targeted in recent conflicts, and the international community has paid more attention to their protection. Human security means that individuals’ safety is a priority on the security agenda. Organizational learning is necessary in crisis management in order to evolve and provide tools to ensure human security. Organizational learning in crisis management requires individual learning, but individual learning does not necessarily lead to organizational learning at the level of institutions. The purpose of this paper is to focus on the development of crisis management and peace-building when taking into account crisis management personnel's experiences and their value in organizational learning processes. The results are applied to the context of humanitarian logistics that have special features including pace in comparison to other crisis management contexts.
Design/methodology/approach
– The empirical material consists of a Delphi panel process representing 15 experts and interviews of 27 individuals who had served as employees in civilian crisis management and military crisis management duties in Kosovo. The interviewees from the military side had background of being either a reservist or professional officer.
Findings
– Interaction and communication abilities are required from crisis management personnel and institutions. Personnel in crisis management need opportunities to give and receive feedback. At the personal level, work in crisis management is important for an individual. Returning home may be more challenging for an individual than starting to work in a mission. The framework of organizational learning is adequate for developing crisis management and humanitarian logistics.
Originality/value
– Crisis management personnel's feelings and opinions in depth have been rarely studied and the present study provides information about this personal level. Because of using two methods focussing on organizational learning and feedback, partial methodological triangular was carried out, which increased the reliability of the results. In regard to humanitarian logistics, feedback arrangements are also important when intending to develop learning organizations. Return arrangements for personnel in humanitarian logistics are also an important focus of study.
Subject
Management Information Systems
Reference23 articles.
1. Axworthy, L.
(1999), “La sécurité humaine: la sécurité des individus dans un monde en mutation”, Politiques étrangères, Vol. 64 No. 2, pp. 333-342.
2. Bajoria, J.
(2011), “Improving UN responses to humanitarian crises”, UN Chronicle, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 30-33.
3. Bellamy, A.J.
(2009), Responsibility to protect. The global efforts to end mass atrocities, Polity, Cambridge.
4. Brenner, T.
,
Mergenthaler, S.
and
Rothmann, P.
(2011), The New World of UN Peace Operations. Learning to Build Peace?, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
5. Christopher, M.
and
Tatham, P.
(2011), “Introduction”, in
Christopher, M.
and
Tatham, P.
(Eds), Humanitarian Logistics. Meeting the Challenge of Preparing for and Responding to Disasters, Kogan Page Limited, London, pp. 1-14.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献