Author:
Burhanudin Burhanudin,Ferguson David
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to explore the factors that make Indonesian consumers differ in their intentions to switch to products that are more eco-friendly than their current products.
Design/methodology/approach
Consumers’ experiences with their current product and evaluation of its more eco-friendly alternative were simulated; the effects on intention to switch to the better product were then investigated.
Findings
This study found that the differences in intentions to switch are attributable to loss aversion and focusing illusion. When consumers follow the principle of loss aversion (exaggeration of greater loss than gain), they are more likely to switch to leave unattractive product (i.e. a product that they perceive as contributing to environmental degradation) than when they do not. Also, when consumers experience focusing illusion concerning the environment (determining happiness based on environmental conditions), they are more likely to switch to make their lives happier than when they do not.
Practical implications
In managing consumer intention to switch, companies should effectively communicate how their products save the environment. This communication could make their customers less likely to give up their current products to live happier lives. Similarly, companies could encourage target customers to switch to their products by arguing that giving up their current products would help them live happier lives.
Originality/value
This study provides empirical evidence that perceived budget constraints may not inhibit consumers from switching to more eco-friendly products to live happier lives.
Subject
Strategy and Management,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Business and International Management
Reference60 articles.
1. ABC (Asia Business Council) (2015), “Asia Business Council annual survey 2015”, available at: www.asiabusinesscouncil.org/ResearchSur15.html (accessed 6 February 2016).
2. How cognitive biases can affect the performance of eco-labeling schemes;Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization,2009
3. The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs;Journal of Marketing Research,2007
4. External validity is more than skin deep: some answers to criticisms of laboratory experiments;American Psychologist,1982
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献