1. Applegate, R.
(2009), “Designing comprehensive assessment plans: the big picture leads to the little picture”, in
Mueller, D.M.
(Ed.),
Pushing the Edge: Explore, Engage, Extend: Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries, March 12-15, 2009, Seattle, Washington
, Association of College and Research Libraries, Chicago, IL, pp. 165-171, available at: www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/national/seattle/papers/165.pdf (accessed October 28, 2014).
2. Association of College and Research Libraries, Research Planning and Review Committee
(2010), “2010 top ten trends in academic libraries: a review of the current literature”,
College & Research Libraries News
, Vol. 71 No. 6, pp. 286-292, available at: http://crln.acrl.org/content/71/6/286.full.pdf (accessed November 17, 2014).
3. Carter, T.M.
(2014), “Assessment and change leadership in an academic library department: a case study”,
Reference Services Review
, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 148-164.
4. Crane, E.
and
Snyder, L.
(2013), “Patron-driven acquisition optimization at liberty university”, paper presented at Computers in Libraries, Washington, DC, April 10, available at: http://works.bepress.com/lori_snyder/2/ (accessed September 30, 2014).
5. Dugan, R.E.
and
Hernon, P.
(2002), “Outcomes assessment: not synonymous with inputs and outputs”,
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
, Vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 376-380.