Pandemic designs for the future: perspectives of technology education teachers during COVID-19

Author:

Code Jillianne,Ralph Rachel,Forde Kieran

Abstract

Purpose The disruption caused by the pandemic declaration and subsequent public health measures put in place have had a substantial effect on teachers’ abilities to support student engagement in technology education (TE). The purpose of this paper is to explore the following research question: How do TE teachers see emergency remote teaching (ERT) transitions to blended learning into the next academic year affecting their profession? Design/methodology/approach A snowball and convenience sampling design was used to recruit specialist teachers in TE through their professional organization and were asked to respond to the question: What are your concerns about the future of teaching TE remotely? The qualitative data collected from the participants (N = 42) was analyzed thematically (Braun and Clarke, 2006). Findings The analysis revealed that the switch to ERT impacted the teachers’ ability to support hands-on competency development owing to inequitable student access to tools, materials and resources, all of which affected student motivation and engagement. As a result, teachers raised questions about the overall effectiveness of online learning approaches and TE’s future and sustainability if offered completely online. Originality/value This research is the first of its kind exploring the experiences of TE teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. In answer to the challenges identified by teachers, the authors offer a blended learning design framework informed by pandemic transformed pedagogy that can serve as a model for educators to use when designing blended instruction.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,Education

Reference38 articles.

1. Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: a systematic literature review;Educational Research Review,2017

2. Using thematic analysis in psychology;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006

3. British Columbia Ministry of Education (BCMOE) (2018a), “Applied design, skills and technology K-12 curriculum: goals and rationale”, BC Ministry of Education official website, available at: https://curriculum.gov.bc.ca/curriculum/adst/core/goals-and-rationale (accessed 9 May 2020).

4. British Columbia Ministry of Education (BCMOE) (2018b), “Applied design, skills and technology K-12 curriculum: machining and welding 12”, BC Ministry of Education official website, available at: https://curriculum.gov.bc.ca/curriculum/adst/12/machining-and-welding (accessed 9 May 2020).

5. British Columbia Ministry of Education (BCMOE) (2018c), “Applied design, skills and technology K-12 curriculum: thinking”, BC Ministry of Education official website, available at: https://curriculum.gov.bc.ca/competencies/thinking (accessed 9 May 2020).

Cited by 101 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3