Organisational paradigms and sustainability in excellence

Author:

Brown Alan

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to focus on how organisations can benefit from adopting an organic paradigm of management to maximise the benefits of quality and business excellence strategy. Mechanistic approaches do not offer long-term sustainability and do not facilitate learning and innovation. Insights from research on business excellence award-winning organisations show how they embed quality into their culture for long-term sustainability. Design/methodology/approach – This paper provides both a conceptual review of two organisational paradigms and relates this to the findings of a qualitative study of Australian Business Excellence Award winners. Interviews with company managers and case material from the organisations provided the information relating to strategies for sustaining business excellence. Findings – Organisations using a business excellence framework and those who have reached award status have adopted a range of approaches to maintain and sustain their performance. These include measures relating to leadership, processes, people, communication and strategy. Specific strategies focus on embedding, relentless driving values and engagement of people throughout. These support ongoing learning and innovation and fit the organic organisational paradigm. Research limitations/implications – Insights into how organisations sustain their use of business excellence frameworks show how business excellence principles can be embedded into organisations so that it becomes “the way we do things around here”. Originality/value – This paper offers insights into key issues faced by organisations that have already achieved high levels of performance on the business excellence frameworks and how they sustain this.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference26 articles.

1. Australian Business Excellence Awards (2013), available at: www.saiglobal.com.au (accessed 17 March 2013).

2. Black, S.A. and Porter, L.J. (1996), “Identification of the critical factors of TQM”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 1-21.

3. Brown, A. and Van der Wiele, T. (1996), “A typology of approaches to ISO Certification and TQM”, Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 57-72.

4. Burns, T. and Stalker, G.M. (1961), The Management of Innovation, Tavistock, London.

5. Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1979), Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, Heinemann, London.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3