Increasing primary school children’s fruit and vegetable consumption

Author:

Taylor Charlotte,Upton Penney,Upton Dominic

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the evidence base of the Food Dudes healthy eating programme, specifically the short- and long-term effectiveness of the intervention for consumption of fruit and vegetables both at school and at home and displacement of unhealthy snack consumption. Design/methodology/approach – Articles were identified using Academic Search Complete, PsycARTICLES, Medline and PubMed databases keywords for the period January 1995 to August 2013. Articles were included if they reported an empirical evaluation of the Food Dudes programme aimed at children aged between 4-11 years. Articles were included regardless of geographical location and publication type (i.e. published and “grey” literature). Findings – Six articles were included for review. Findings indicated that the programme was moderately effective in the short term; however, the long-term effectiveness of the programme is unknown. The ability of the programme to generalise to the home setting and to displace unhealthy snack foods also requires further investigation. Originality/value – This is the first independent review of the Food Dudes programme. In light of the extensive roll out of the Food Dudes programme, an appraisal of the evidence surrounding the programme is timely. The review highlights that sustaining fruit and vegetable intake cannot be achieved through behaviour-based interventions alone and the long-term maintenance of fruit and vegetable consumption requires more than the implementation of an intervention found to be effective in a controlled research environment.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education

Reference55 articles.

1. Altman, D.G. (2009), “Challenges in sustaining public health interventions”, Health Education & Behavior , Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 24-28.

2. Baban, A. and Craciun, C. (2007), “Changing health-risk behaviours: a review of theory and evidence-based interventions in health psychology”, Journal of Cognitive and Behavioural Psychotherapies , Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 45-67.

3. Bandura, A. (1977), Social Learning Theory , Prentice Hall, New Jersey, NJ.

4. Bangor Food and Activity Research Unit University (BFARU) (2010), “Wolverhampton evaluation, 2009”, working paper, Bangor University, Bangor, March.

5. Belsey, J. (2009), “What is evidence-based medicine?”, available at: www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/painres/download/whatis/ebm.pdf (accessed 1 December 2014).

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3