Clinicians' psychological empowerment to engage in management as part of their daily work

Author:

Andersson ThomasORCID,Eriksson NomieORCID,Müllern TomasORCID

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the article is to analyze how physicians and nurses, as the two major health care professions, experience psychological empowerment for managerial work.Design/methodology/approachThe study was designed as a qualitative interview study at four primary care centers (PCCs) in Sweden. In total, 47 interviews were conducted, mainly with physicians and nurses. The first inductive analysis led us to the concept of psychological empowerment, which was used in the next deductive step of the analysis.FindingsThe study showed that both professions experienced self-determination for managerial work, but that nurses were more dependent on structural empowerment. Nurses experienced that they had competence for managerial work, whereas physicians were more ignorant of such competence. Nurses used managerial work to create impact on the conditions for their clinical work, whereas physicians experienced impact independently. Both nurses and physicians experienced managerial work as meaningful, but less meaningful than nurses and physicians' clinical work.Practical implicationsFor an effective health care system, structural changes in terms of positions, roles, and responsibilities can be an important route for especially nurses' psychological empowerment.Originality/valueThe qualitative method provided a complementary understanding of psychological empowerment on how psychological empowerment interacted with other factors. One such aspect was nurses' higher dependence on structural empowerment, but the most important aspect was that both physicians and nurses experienced that managerial work was less meaningful than clinical work. This implies that psychological empowerment for managerial work may only make a difference if psychological empowerment does not compete with physicians' and nurses' clinical work.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference53 articles.

1. Connective professionalism: towards (yet another) ideal type;Journal of Professions and Organization,2020

2. The role of empowering leadership and psychological empowerment on nurses’ work engagement and affective commitment;International Journal of Organizational Analysis,2022

3. The medical leadership challenge in healthcare is an identity challenge;Leadership in Health Services,2015

4. If it is complex, let it be complex – dealing with institutional complexity in hospitals; Comment on ‘Dual agency in hospitals: what strategies do managers and physicians apply to reconcile dilemmas between clinical and economic considerations?;International Journal of Health Policy and Management,2022

5. Understanding institutional work through social interaction in highly institutionalized settings: lessons from public healthcare organizations;Scandinavian Journal of Management,2020

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3