Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to investigate the rising trend of virtual influencers – digitally created characters with human-like attributes. It aims to evaluate and compare their effectiveness with human influencers in terms of brand attitudes and purchase intentions. It uncovers the mechanisms underlying the differences in effectiveness observed between virtual influencers and their human counterparts.
Design/methodology/approach
The research uses a 2 (influencer type: human vs virtual) × 3 (product type: functional vs symbolic vs experiential) between-subjects design. Through a pilot study (n = 334) and a main study (n = 352), the research examines the interactive effects of influencer and product type on brand attitude and purchase intentions. Hypotheses were developed and tested using moderating mediation models centered on authenticity and product–endorser fit.
Findings
Virtual influencers are perceived as less authentic than human influencers across all product types, negatively influencing brand attitude and purchase intention. However, the extent to which influencer type affects brand attitudes and purchase intentions, mediated by product–endorser fit, varies based on the product type.
Originality/value
This research emphasizes two key mechanisms – authenticity and product–endorser fit – influencing the effectiveness of virtual influencers. It suggests that aligning virtual influencers with suitable product types can offset their perceived authenticity deficit, significantly affecting their endorsement effectiveness.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Marketing
Reference77 articles.
1. Almost human? A comparative case study on the social media presence of virtual influencers;International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,2021
2. Authenticity under threat: when social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation;Journal of Business Research,2020
3. Experiential product attributes and preferences for new products: the role of processing fluency;Journal of Business Research,2014
4. A systematic review of virtual influencers: similarities and differences between human and virtual influencers in interactive advertising;Journal of Interactive Advertising,2023
5. Task-dependent algorithm aversion;Journal of Marketing Research,2019