Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide an empirical analysis on inpatient satisfaction in Malaysian public hospitals.Design/methodology/approachA self‐administered questionnaire was the main data collection method. Altogether, 23 hospitals throughout Peninsular Malaysia participated in the survey. Cluster sampling was used in the selection of the respondent hospitals, while convenience sampling was used in administering the survey.FindingsThree factors of inpatient satisfaction were extracted, which were clinical and physical dimensions of service, and additional facilities for patients and family members. Inpatient satisfaction was found to be higher for the clinical dimension than for the physical dimension. Overall, inpatient satisfaction was high, as reflected by the high mean score of the variables, although caution was expressed in interpreting the findings, particularly the low expectations of patients to begin with.Research limitations/implicationsThe research was limited to inpatients of Malaysian public hospitals. A thorough evaluation of the nation's public healthcare delivery system would need to include outpatient services as well.Originality/valueThe paper provides an empirical analysis on inpatient satisfaction in Malaysian public hospitals. This allows policy makers to evaluate the level of public healthcare delivery service in the country and therefore assist in policy decision‐making and implementation.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference33 articles.
1. Abdullah, A.R., Adnan, Z.D., Ghazali, R.J.D., Mahmood, R., Thuraisingham, J. and Ahmad, A.H. (2000), “A study of an excellent organisation: Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan Kuantan, Pahang Darul Makmur”, unpublished document, Institute for Health Management, Kuala Lumpur.
2. Angelopoulou, P., Kangis, P. and Babis, G. (1998), “Private and public medicine: a comparison of quality perceptions”, International Journal of Healthcare Quality Assurance, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 14‐20.
3. Batchelor, C., Owens, D.J., Read, M. and Bloor, M. (1994), “Patient satisfaction studies: methodology, management and consumer evaluation”, International Journal of Healthcare Quality Assurance, Vol. 7 No. 7, pp. 22‐31.
4. Coyle, J. and Williams, B. (1999), “Seeing the woods for the trees: defining the forgotten concept of patient dissatisfaction in the light of patient satisfaction research”, Leadership in Health Services, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 1‐9.
5. Donabedian, A. (1988), “The quality of care: how can it be assessed?”, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 260 No. 12, pp. 1743‐8.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献