Author:
Mandel Richard,Noyes Erik
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to analyze experiential entrepreneurship education offerings – programs and courses – among the “Top 25” undergraduate schools of entrepreneurship in the USA. The motivation is to understand the array and vitality of experiential initiatives across the country. A related aim is to unearth obstacles to offering experiential entrepreneurship and identify affordable, viable options. Surveying undergraduate program deans, chairs and administrators, the authors inventory and analyze experiences offered in top entrepreneurship programs. The target audience for the research is entrepreneurship education researchers and business program leaders.
Design/methodology/approach
– The methodology is a survey approach. A survey was sent to the entrepreneurship program leaders of the “Top 25” business schools according to recently published rankings. In total, 57 percent of the target population responded to the survey.
Findings
– The authors find that credit-yielding experiential entrepreneurship offerings are abundant. Yet an array of challenges constrain the growth this mode of delivery – including finding suitable faculty, mentors and other support resources.
Research limitations/implications
– A potential limitation of the study is its focus on “Top 25” undergraduate entrepreneurship programs, as this may not be reflective of activity in the wider sample of entrepreneurship programs.
Practical implications
– The first inventory of its kind, this study provides vital knowledge about the array of practices by leading programs. The study may be used to drive benchmarking and further innovation by leaders of entrepreneurship programs.
Originality/value
– To the best knowledge of the authors, this is the most comprehensive, recent study of undergraduate, experiential entrepreneurship education.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Education,Life-span and Life-course Studies
Reference22 articles.
1. Dhliwayo, S.
(2008), “Experiential learning in entrepreneurship education: a prospective model for South African tertiary institutions”,
Education+Training
, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 329-340.
2. Gibb, A.
(2002), “Creating conducive environments for learning and entrepreneurship: living with, dealing with, creating and enjoying uncertainty and complexity”,
Industry and Higher Education
, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 135-148.
3. Gibb, A.
(2011), “Concepts into practice: meeting the challenge of development of entrepreneurship educators around an innovative paradigm”,
International Journal of Entrepreneurship Behavior & Research
, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 146-165.
4. Higgins, D.
and
Elliott, C.
(2011), “Learning to make sense: what works in entrepreneurial education?”,
Journal of European Industrial Training
, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 345-367.
5. Hills, G.E.
and
Morris, M.H.
(1998), “Entrepreneurship education: a conceptual model and review”,
Educating Entrepreneurs for Wealth Creation
, Aldershot, Brookfield, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Hunts, pp. 38-58.
Cited by
79 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献